Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Taylor Vs. Benham

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1847

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

67 entries 4 linked 63 unlinked
Show
  1. Peter Vs. Beverly US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1836
  2. Vaughan Vs. Northup US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1841
  3. Hunt Vs. Rousmanier US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1828
  4. Craig Vs. Leslie US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1818
  5. U.S. 233 (1847) U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. Benham
    Search
  6. U.S. 5 How. 233 233 (1847) Taylor v. Benham
    Search
  7. Page 46 U. S. 237 March 22, V Cash
    Search
  8. Expenses at Edgefield court-house 5.00 April 22, V Cash
    Search
  9. that an administrator de bonis non is not liable for assets in the hands of the deceased executor. See Grant v. Chambers
    Search
  10. Alsop v. Marrow
    Search
  11. of these decisions be not doubtful at law, they may require several exceptions and limitations in equity. See Blower v. Massetts
    Search
  12. Fletcher's Administrator v. Wise
    Search
  13. prosecuted elsewhere for the amount. The following cases may be referred to in support of such a position. Vaughan v. Northup
    Search
  14. Aspeden v. Nixon
    Search
  15. Carmichael v. Ray
    Search
  16. after the answer, instead of a special replication, as provided by the 45th rule of this Court. See Marstaller v. M'Clean
    Search
  17. Cranch 156, and Miller v. McIntyre
    Search
  18. thus formally and finally settled, after the lapse of twenty years and the death of the parties concerned. Gardner v. Wagner
    Search
  19. Miller v. McIntyre
    Search
  20. Cholmondely v. Clinton
    Search
  21. Clay v. Hart
    Search
  22. Zebach v. Smith
    Search
  23. it is not necessary to review them again, it having been so ably performed by Thompson, J., for this Court in Peter v. Beverly
    Search
  24. Schauber v. Jackson
    Search
  25. Bradstreet v. Clarke
    Search
  26. Bloomer v. Waldron
    Search
  27. Oates v. Cooke
    Search
  28. Jackson v. Martin
    Search
  29. Coster v. Lorillard
    Search
  30. coupled with an interest, to have its duration and quantity commensurate with the object to be accomplished. Shelly v. Edlin
    Search
  31. White v. Simpson
    Search
  32. at once vested elsewhere, and it being necessary to have it in the executors to effect the general design, Jackson v. Schauber
    Search
  33. s.c. 7 Cow. 193, as well as from the usual course, which is by an express devise to the executors. Bradstreet v. Clarke
    Search
  34. Wend. Page 46 U. S. 269 665, 667. Nor is it of any consequence how small the interest be. Osgood v. Franklin
    Search
  35. Bergen v. Bennett
    Search
  36. Binn. 69. The interest, too, may be equitable or legal. Hearle v. Greenbank
    Search
  37. an interest not required to yield a profit or gain, but any title in the estate itself, the thing to be sold. Hunt v. Rousmanier
    Search
  38. into personal estate, for the alien legatees, in order to avoid the very escheat now set up by the respondent. Craig v. Leslie
    Search
  39. at once which is directed to be done, and the land as money, and thus to be passed to those entitled to it. Peter v. Beverly
    Search
  40. Bogert v. Hertell
    Search
  41. In such cases, till the sale is made, the title usually vests in the heirs, if no other intent is manifest. Jackson v. Burr
    Search
  42. Denn v. Gaskin
    Search
  43. should be considered as passing by devise, and as being in the complainants by devise, rather than descent. Jackson v. Schauber
    Search
  44. legatees, and be held by them for the cestui que trusts. See the cases there cited, and among them Braybroke v. Inskip
    Search
  45. Pick. 112. See also Dexter v. Stewart
    Search
  46. general devise like this to the residuary legatees if no circumstances appear to indicate a contrary intent. Braybroke v. Inskip
    Search
  47. Ballard v. Carter
    Search
  48. Marlow v. Smith
    Search
  49. cestui que trusts, hold the estate for them and be bound to account for it to them, so as to make it safe. Marlow v. Smith
    Search
  50. him, though no office had been found, the respondent considering an escheat good without any office found. Montgomery v. Dorion
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial