Citation network
Henderson Vs. Anderson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1845
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 73 (1845) U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. AndersonSearch
-
U.S. 3 How. 73 73 (1845) Henderson v. AndersonSearch
-
N AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Syllabus This Court adheres to the rule laid down in Walton v. ShellySearch
-
T.R. 296, sustained as it has been by the decisions of this Court in Bank of the United States v. DunnSearch
-
Pet. 12, and Scott v. LloydSearch
-
competency is not denied, but it is said, on the authority of the doctrine first distinctly laid down in Walton v. ShellySearch
-
induced them first to limit its application to negotiable instruments and finally to abandon it altogether. Jordaine v. LashbrookSearch
-
followed. In others, where it had been originally adopted, the courts have been gradually receding from it. Stafford v. RiceSearch
-
Powell v. WatersSearch
-
Williams v. WalbridgeSearch
-
the paper sought to be attacked must not only be negotiable, but have been actually negotiated. United States v. DunnSearch
-
United States v. LifflerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Blagg v. PhoenixSearch
-
Baird v. CochraneSearch
-
only a mode whereby the endorsers undertook to become sureties for a debt due by the drawers to the plaintiff. Powell v. WatersSearch
-
well settled that the rule does not apply to cases of fraud or misconduct to which the holder was a party. Peterson v. WillingSearch
-
Langer v. FeltonSearch
-
McPherson v. PowersSearch
-
its character. The witness is, therefore, as competent in the one as in other. The case is similar to that of Baring v. ShippenSearch
-
discussion and to different conclusions in the courts both of England and in this country. In the case of Walton v. ShellySearch
-
as to permit the impeachment of such an instrument by persons standing in the same relation to it. See Jordaine v. LashbrookSearch
-
s Bench of either side of this question have been adopted. In this Court, the rule laid down in the case of Walton v. ShellySearch
-
to with a uniformity which establishes it as the law of the Court. Thus, in the case of Bank of the United States v. DunnSearch
-
in the case of Bank of the Metropolis v. JonesSearch
-
and in the case of Scott v. LloydSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. AndersonSearch
-
Walton v. ShellySearch
-
and Scott v. LloydSearch
-
Jordaine v. LashbrookSearch
-
Stafford v. RiceSearch
-
of Baring v. ShippenSearch
-
of Walton v. ShellySearch
-
See Jordaine v. LashbrookSearch
-
of Bank of the United States v. DunnSearch
-
of Bank of the Metropolis v. JonesSearch
-
of Scott v. LloydSearch
-
United States v. DunnSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial