Citation network
Prigg Vs. Pennsylvania
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1842
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 539 (1842) U.S. Supreme Court Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. 16 Pet. 539 539 (1842) Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
be that the state legislatures have a right to interfere. This doctrine was fully recognized in the case of Houston v. MooreSearch
-
and the Judiciary have, upon various occasions, acted upon this as a sound and reasonable doctrine. Cited, Stuart v. LairdSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
power of legislation in relation to fugitives from labor is exclusive in the National Legislature. Cited, Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
Sec. v. EverySearch
-
A more limited but, at the same time, an equally expressive, definition was given by Lord Dyer, as cited in Stowel v. ZouchSearch
-
is as the direct provisions made by it. This doctrine was fully recognized by this Court, in the case of Houston v. MooreSearch
-
and Pennsylvania, and, on all these occasions, its validity has been affirmed. The cases cited at the bar, of Wright v. DeaconSearch
-
Glen v. HodgesSearch
-
Jack v. MartinSearch
-
and Commonwealth v. GriffinSearch
-
occasions, acted upon this as a sound and reasonable doctrine. Especially did this Court, in the cases of Stuart v. LairdSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cranch 299, and Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, and in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
and we shall now proceed briefly to state our reasons for that opinion. The doctrine stated by this Court in Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
effectual, it should be construed to be exclusive of state authority. We adopt the language of this Court in Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
rests upon more than one of its decisions upon the constitutional action of state authorities. In the case of Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
In the case of Houston v. MooreSearch
-
In the case or the City of New York v. MilnSearch
-
lays down the following position (p. 36 U. S. 137 ), as directly deducible from the decision in Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Wheat. 204, and Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
yet, in the cases of fugitives from labor and from justice, they have the power to do so. In the case of Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
and, like many other powers in that instrument, require legislation. In the language of this Court in Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
of Houston v. MooreSearch
-
Cited, Stuart v. LairdSearch
-
the National Legislature. Cited, Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
Stowel v. ZouchSearch
-
of Wright v. DeaconSearch
-
of Stuart v. LairdSearch
-
and Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
of Sturgis v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
the City of New York v. MilnSearch
-
and Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
of Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial