Citation network
MartIn Vs. Waddell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1842
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 367 (1842) U.S. Supreme Court Martin v. WaddellSearch
-
U.S. 16 Pet. 367 367 (1842) Martin v. WaddellSearch
-
to the principles of the British Constitution, was the proper organ to dispose of the public domain. Cited, Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
grants of territory made on this continent. The doctrine upon this subject is clearly stated in the case of Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
reconciled. But from the opinions expressed by the justices of the Court of King's Bench in the case of Blundell v. CatterallSearch
-
Barn. & Ald. 287, 294, 304, 309, and in the case of Duke of Somerset v. FogwellSearch
-
sanctioned by the courts. And the right now claimed was not seriously asserted on their part before the case of Arnold v. MundySearch
-
but to have been so possessed and enjoyed. A majority of the Court seems to have adopted the doctrine of Arnold v. MundySearch
-
the course of New Jersey in relation to this claim is hardly consistent with her pretensions. In the case of Arnold v. MundySearch
-
them. It surely would not be claimed by the state, it being no longer susceptible of public use. The case of Brown v. KennedySearch
-
a grant. In the argument of this case, the counsel on the part of the defendant referred to the case of Warren v. MatthewsSearch
-
a valid grant could be made. At all events, it is very certain that the King's Bench, in the case of Carter v. MurcotSearch
-
did not recognize the doctrine of Warren v. MatthewsSearch
-
the doctrine as laid down in the case of Page 41 U. S. 426 Carter v. MurcotSearch
-
have come before the courts in the State of New York, and the principles and rules as laid down in the case of Carter v. MurcotSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
fully recognized and adopted. In the case of James v. GouldSearch
-
and cases are referred to showing such to be the settled law. In the case of Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
is one containing not only a grant of the soil, but of the powers of government. This Court, in the case of Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
The absolute ownership could not be expressed in a more full and unqualified a manner. In the case of Fairfax v. Hunter'sSearch
-
of the powers of government surrendered by the proprietors to Queen Anne, and it is only since the decision in Arnold v. MundySearch
-
and in the case of Rogers v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Martin v. WaddellSearch
-
Cited, Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
of Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
of Blundell v. CatterallSearch
-
of Duke of Somerset v. FogwellSearch
-
of Arnold v. MundySearch
-
of Brown v. KennedySearch
-
of Warren v. MatthewsSearch
-
of Carter v. MurcotSearch
-
Carter v. MurcotSearch
-
of James v. GouldSearch
-
of Fairfax v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Arnold v. MundySearch
-
of Rogers v. AllenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial