Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

City of Mobile Vs. Eslava

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1842

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 31 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 234 (1842) U.S. Supreme Court City of Mobile v. Eslava
    Search
  2. U.S. 16 Pet. 234 234 (1842) City of Mobile v. Eslava
    Search
  3. This Court gave some consideration to the construction of this section in the case of Pollard's Heirs v. Kibbe
    Search
  4. or last, this is not to be avoided. That the whole case is before this Court will be seen by reference to Ross v. Borland
    Search
  5. s claim was rejected on a construction given to the plaintiff's patent and entry. It recognized the case of Matthews v. Zane
    Search
  6. This decision was made in 1808. The case of Ross v. Borland
    Search
  7. The Court held that, as both parties claimed under the act of Congress, the case of Matthews v. Zane
    Search
  8. governed. Page 41 U. S. 250 The point was more prominently presented in Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  9. his action void on a construction of the acts of Congress governing the case, following, to some extent, Martin v. Hunter
    Search
  10. would not be a shade of difference in the cases. On this point there was no doubt entertained in Pollard's Heirs v. Kibbe
    Search
  11. beyond controversy, in regard to all our territory acquired from Spain. So the Supreme Court of Alabama held in Hagan v. Campbell
    Search
  12. the country having been ceded to the United States. Garcia v. Lee
    Search
  13. Co. It lies at the city, is two hundred and sixty-three acres on the high land, and was adjudged a good title in Hagan v. Campbell
    Search
  14. by the Supreme Court of Alabama. 8 Porter 1-25. So, in Pollard v. Kibbe
    Search
  15. so it was confidently asserted in the argument of the cause of Martin v. Waddell
    Search
  16. So, in New York, lands were held under tidewater, especially about the city, by individual titles. Mayor v. Scott
    Search
  17. West New Jersey -- and to a great extent, in Pennsylvania and Maryland. The authorities will be found in Martin v. Waddell
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court City of Mobile v. Eslava
    Search
  19. of Pollard's Heirs v. Kibbe
    Search
  20. Ross v. Borland
    Search
  21. of Matthews v. Zane
    Search
  22. of Ross v. Borland
    Search
  23. Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  24. Martin v. Hunter
    Search
  25. Pollard's Heirs v. Kibbe
    Search
  26. Hagan v. Campbell
    Search
  27. the United States. Garcia v. Lee
    Search
  28. Pollard v. Kibbe
    Search
  29. of Martin v. Waddell
    Search
  30. Mayor v. Scott
    Search
  31. Martin v. Waddell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial