Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mcelmoyle Vs. Cohen

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1839

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 1 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Mills Vs. Duryee US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1813
  2. U.S. 312 (1839) U.S. Supreme Court McElmoyle v. Cohen
    Search
  3. U.S. 13 Pet. 312 312 (1839) McElmoyle v. Cohen
    Search
  4. judgment as to the merits of the claim or subject matter of the suit. When, therefore, this Court said, in Mills v. Duryee
    Search
  5. law prescription, or by a statute of limitation, may not be pleaded, any more than where this Court, in Hampton v. McConnell
    Search
  6. we think it well settled to be a plea to the remedy, and consequently that the lex fori must prevail. Higgins v. Scott
    Search
  7. Barn. & Ad. 413. 4 Cowen 528, note 10. Id., 503. Van Ramsdyk v. Kane
    Search
  8. Gallis 371. Le Roy v. Crowninshield
    Search
  9. Mason 351. British Linen Com. v. Drummond
    Search
  10. Bar. & Cres. 903. De La Vega v. Veanna
    Search
  11. Barn. & Ad. 284. De Couche v. Savalier
    Search
  12. Johns.Ch. 190. Lincoln v. Battalle
    Search
  13. Wend. 475. Gulick v. Lodes
    Search
  14. the lex fori, or the suit will be barred. Counsel have relied, to establish a contrary doctrine, upon Marlow v. Naylor
    Search
  15. was obviously decided upon a misconception of the learned judges of the decision of this Court in the case of Mills v. Duryee
    Search
  16. that in the administration of insolvent estates in Georgia, such judgments take no precedence. Case of Ten Eyck v. Ten
    Search
  17. decision in point, from the courts of Georgia that the judges of her superior courts hold the same opinion. In Cameron v. Admrs
    Search
  18. as matter of evidence, it shall be entitled to full faith and credit. But if the decisions in the cases of Ten Eyck v. Ten
    Search
  19. Eyck and Cameron v. Wurtz
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court McElmoyle v. Cohen
    Search
  21. Hampton v. McConnell
    Search
  22. Higgins v. Scott
    Search
  23. Van Ramsdyk v. Kane
    Search
  24. Le Roy v. Crowninshield
    Search
  25. British Linen Com. v. Drummond
    Search
  26. De La Vega v. Veanna
    Search
  27. De Couche v. Savalier
    Search
  28. Lincoln v. Battalle
    Search
  29. Gulick v. Lodes
    Search
  30. Marlow v. Naylor
    Search
  31. of Mills v. Duryee
    Search
  32. Case of Ten Eyck v. Ten
    Search
  33. In Cameron v. Admrs
    Search
  34. of Ten Eyck v. Ten
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial