Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Garcia Vs. Lee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1838

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 28 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 511 (1838) U.S. Supreme Court Garcia v. Lee
    Search
  2. U.S. 12 Pet. 511 511 (1838) Garcia v. Lee
    Search
  3. Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  4. after the cession of Louisiana to the United States were carefully examined and decided in the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  5. United States according to the fair import of its words and its true construction. In the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  6. and in deciding the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  7. Afterwards, in the case of United States v. Percheman
    Search
  8. The Court does not apply this principle to grants made within the Territory of Louisiana. The case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  9. none of its principles was questioned except that referred to. The leading principle in the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  10. departments was after that case directly acknowledged and affirmed by this Court in 1832 in the case of United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  11. with extracting several portions of the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Marshall in the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  12. Such were the opinions and language of this Court in the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  13. of St. Ildefonso in 1800, as hereinbefore mentioned. On the contrary, although the Court, in the case of United States v. Percheman
    Search
  14. refer to the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  15. can be inferred that the opinion of the Court had changed in relation to any other principle decided in Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  16. by the Court, and as none of its principles was questioned except the one above mentioned, the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  17. must in all other respects be considered as affirmed by that of United States v. Percheman
    Search
  18. department, was subsequently directly acknowledged and affirmed by this Court in 1832 in the case of United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  19. that information could not have shaken the confidence of the Court in any of the opinions pronounced in Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  20. further than has been already stated. In this view of the subject, the case of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  21. the territory of another, and if a proposition so evident needed confirmation, it will be found in the case of Poole v. Fleeger
    Search
  22. already been decided in this Court, we should be prepared now to adopt all of the principles affirmed in Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Garcia v. Lee
    Search
  24. of Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  25. of United States v. Percheman
    Search
  26. of United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  27. Foster & Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  28. of Poole v. Fleeger
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial