Citation network
Briscoe Vs. Bank of Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1837
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Briscoe v. BankSearch
-
of Commonwealth of Kentucky - 36 U.S. 257 (1837) U.S. Supreme Court Briscoe v. BankSearch
-
of Commonwealth of Kentucky, 36 U.S. 11 Pet. 257 257 (1837) Briscoe v. BankSearch
-
were issued in the early history of the colonies, afterwards the United States of America. The case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
is certain that no suit could have been maintained on this ground prior to the Constitution. The case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
obligations of an entirely different character. There is no principle decided by this Court in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
are sustained and strengthened by contrasting the present case with that. The case of Bank of the United States v. Planters'Search
-
Bank of Georgia, 9 Wheat. 904, cited. The case of Bank of the Commonwealth v. WisterSearch
-
given in consideration of a loan of its notes. We consider this question as having been settled in the case of Lampton v. BankSearch
-
recognized and confirmed by a hundred cases that have since passed through this Court. The case of Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
which required their emission precluded the possibility of their immediate redemption. In the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
In the case Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Page 36 U. S. 323 It is insisted that the principles of this case were settled in the suit of Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
substance but also as to their origin and effect. There is no principle decided by the Court in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
be given in the language of this Court used in former adjudications. In the case of Bank of the United States v. Planters'Search
-
In the case of Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. WisterSearch
-
sovereign state. But the Court is of opinion that the question is no longer open here. The case of United States Bank v. Planters'Search
-
of the Constitution of the United States. In principle, it was thought to be decided by the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
After the decision of the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
Miller v. RiceSearch
-
the prohibition. Let the impressive language of Mr. Chief Justice Marshall on this very point, in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
theoretical sense. But I trust that I shall abundantly show that the definition which was given in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
very history that any other definition of bills of credit than that given by the Supreme Court in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
be sufficient to quote the answer of the Chief Justice in delivering the opinion of the Court in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
The interpretation for which I contend is precisely that which was maintained by this Court in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
and civil liberty, I hope may never be established. I find no warrant for any such doctrine in the case of Craig v. StateSearch
-
before I yield my assent that the point has been so decided. The case relied on is Bank of Commonwealth of Kentucky v. WisterSearch
-
And in confirmation of this view of the matter, a passage was cited from the opinion in United States Bank v. Planters'Search
-
and does not act in the character of a sovereign. That was the doctrine of this Court in United States Bank v. Planters'Search
-
It has so happened that I am the only member of the Court who composed one of the majority in the case of Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
authority on which the opinion of the Court is based, so that my position is as peculiar in this as it was in Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
I stand in some measure alone. A judge who now dissents may find reasons therefor in the opinion delivered in Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
a very contrary conclusion as to mine. These considerations must be my apology for the course now taken. In Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
evident that the judgment of this Court depended on this part of the law. With this explanation, the case of Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
contracts existing when the law was enacted, which operates only on the obligation of posterior contracts, Ogden v. SaundersSearch
-
For myself, I rest on the most solemn adjudications of this Court, as well prior as subsequent to the case of Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
acts of Parliament, of the old and new Congress, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution, I held, in Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Briscoe v. BankSearch
-
of Craig v. StateSearch
-
of Bank of the United States v. Planters'Search
-
of Bank of the Commonwealth v. WisterSearch
-
of Lampton v. BankSearch
-
of Craig v. MissouriSearch
-
Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. WisterSearch
-
of United States Bank v. Planters'Search
-
Miller v. RiceSearch
-
Bank of Commonwealth of Kentucky v. WisterSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial