Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schley Vs. Pullman Car Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 07, 1837

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 2 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Mccormick Vs. Sullivant US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  2. United States Vs. Crosby US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1812
  3. Schley v. Pullman
    Search
  4. Car Co. - 120 U.S. 575 (1837) U.S. Supreme Court Schley v. Pullman
    Search
  5. Car Co., 120 U.S. 575 (1887) Schley v. Pullman
    Search
  6. that the acknowledgment is defective. In Lane v. Soulard
    Search
  7. married women of their lands in Illinois until the passage of the act of February 22, 1847. See also Higgins v. Crosby
    Search
  8. Ill. 260, Rogers v. Higgins
    Search
  9. mode in which real property situated within the limits of that state may be conveyed or transferred. United States v. Crosby
    Search
  10. Clark v. Graham
    Search
  11. Brine v. Ins
    Search
  12. Co., 96 U. S. 627 . In Johnson v. Montgomery
    Search
  13. local statutes mean when they require the wife to join with the husband in a conveyance of real estate. In Miller v. Shaw
    Search
  14. The latest case to which our attention has been called is Yocum v. Lovell
    Search
  15. Miller v. Shaw
    Search
  16. Adams & Durham 185. It was said in Lindley v. Smith
    Search
  17. Murphy v. Williamson
    Search
  18. error does not follow. The cases cited do not sustain the objection to the certificate of acknowledgment. In Lindley v. Smith
    Search
  19. proved by a witness to be the person who had, as wife, signed the deed. To the same class belong the cases of Heinrich v. Simpson
    Search
  20. Ill. 57, and Coburn v. Herrington
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Schley v. Pullman
    Search
  22. In Lane v. Soulard
    Search
  23. Higgins v. Crosby
    Search
  24. Rogers v. Higgins
    Search
  25. In Johnson v. Montgomery
    Search
  26. In Miller v. Shaw
    Search
  27. Yocum v. Lovell
    Search
  28. Miller v. Shaw
    Search
  29. Lindley v. Smith
    Search
  30. Murphy v. Williamson
    Search
  31. In Lindley v. Smith
    Search
  32. of Heinrich v. Simpson
    Search
  33. and Coburn v. Herrington
    Search
  34. Suydam v. Williamson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial