Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Arredondo

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1832

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

52 entries 2 linked 50 unlinked
Show
  1. Fletcher Vs. Peck US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1810
  2. Greenleaf Vs. Birth US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1835
  3. U.S. 691 (1832) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  4. U.S. 6 Pet. 691 691 (1832) United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  5. equity. When the construction of this treaty was under the consideration of the Court in the case of Foster and Elam v. Nelson
    Search
  6. ones. We must therefore be distinctly understood as not in the least impairing, but affirming, the principle of Foster v. Nelson
    Search
  7. Henderson v. Poindexter
    Search
  8. Magna Charta, still less the common law, does not extend its principles to it -- King v. Picton
    Search
  9. the second section were less explicit, and according Page 31 U. S. 716 to the rule established in Henderson v. Poindexter
    Search
  10. the decisions of any other are to be deemed better evidence of those rules or the principles of justice. In Conard v. Nicoll
    Search
  11. act of 1822, yet we consider it a rule of decision for the reasons before stated, and on the authority of Henderson v. Poindexter
    Search
  12. its exemplification is a record of absolute verity. Patterson v. Winn
    Search
  13. King v. Picton
    Search
  14. the grant in question as to deserve a close examination. They will be considered in their order. In Polk's Lessee v. Wendell
    Search
  15. Wheat. 302. The same principle applies to those of a territory, and to Florida, by the act of 1824. In Hoofnagle v. Anderson
    Search
  16. might have decided in favor of its validity, and that such decision would have been conclusive. Henderson v. Poindexter
    Search
  17. in which it found itself in giving a construction to the treaty in the case of Foster and Elam Page 31 U. S. 735 v. Nelson
    Search
  18. The present situation of the holders of the grants, the state of the country, the opinion of this Court in Foster v. Nelson
    Search
  19. such law is void, Fletcher v. Peck
    Search
  20. Cranch 87. A state cannot impose a tax on land granted with an exemption from taxation, New Jersey v. Wilson
    Search
  21. Cranch 164, nor take away a corporate franchise, Dartmouth College v. Woodward
    Search
  22. property alleged to be conveyed as evidence of the intention of the grantor, is in law such, that in the case of Moore v. Magrath
    Search
  23. the authority of this case is unquestionable. In Shirras v. Craig
    Search
  24. Rutherford v. Green
    Search
  25. E. 6). Si quis rem dat, et partem retinet, illa pars quam retinet semper cum eo est et semper fuit. Greenleaf v. Birth
    Search
  26. otherwise the question would be a political one, not cognizable by this Court, as was decided in Foster and Elam v. Nelson
    Search
  27. acquired by any Spanish grant not embraced by these laws, we should feel bound to follow the course pursued in Foster v. Nelson
    Search
  28. adverse possession. This is a settled principle of the common law, recognized and adopted by this Court in Green v. Litter
    Search
  29. Barr v. Gratz
    Search
  30. Propagation Society v. Pawlett
    Search
  31. Clarke v. Courtney
    Search
  32. uniform decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the solemn decision of this Court in Huidekoper's Lessee v. Douglass
    Search
  33. by whom it was made, and such is the construction given to this article by this Court in the case of Foster and Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  34. some such object. The true rule on this subject is laid down by Mr. Justice Washington, in the case of Hylton v. Brown
    Search
  35. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  36. of Foster and Elam v. Nelson
    Search
  37. of Foster v. Nelson
    Search
  38. In Conard v. Nicoll
    Search
  39. of Henderson v. Poindexter
    Search
  40. In Polk's Lessee v. Wendell
    Search
  41. In Hoofnagle v. Anderson
    Search
  42. Foster v. Nelson
    Search
  43. New Jersey v. Wilson
    Search
  44. Dartmouth College v. Woodward
    Search
  45. of Moore v. Magrath
    Search
  46. In Shirras v. Craig
    Search
  47. Foster and Elam v. Nelson
    Search
  48. Green v. Litter
    Search
  49. of Foster and Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  50. of Hylton v. Brown
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial