Citation network
Shanks Vs. Dupont
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1830
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 242 (1830) U.S. Supreme Court Shanks v. DupontSearch
-
U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830) Shanks v. DupontSearch
-
was an American citizen. Page 28 U. S. 245 After the elaborate opinions expressed in the case of Inglis v. TrusteesSearch
-
to ordinary transactions, but stand upon the more general principles of the law of nations. The case of Martin v. CommonwealthSearch
-
and it was held that she was not within the purview of the act. The same remark disposes of the case of Sewall v. LeeSearch
-
court expressly refused to decide whether the wife by her withdrawal with her husband became an alien. But in Kelly v. HarrisonSearch
-
by the treaty of peace. But as to its effect, the British courts concur in our view of it. For in the case of Thomas v. AcklamSearch
-
the British courts, in construing the treaty of peace, have recognized this right of election, and the case of Thomas v. AcklamSearch
-
alien at his death, and could not take even a right of entry by descent, as has been distinctly recognized in Hunter v. FairfaxSearch
-
as I was instrumental, to have this question settled on principle. But it does appear to me, that in the case of Coxe v. McIlvaineSearch
-
allegiance the British courts have solemnly decided the King has no claim. On this point the case of Ludlow, in Thomas v. AcklamSearch
-
so far as they depend upon local law. This is certainly the case in Massachusetts. The decision in the case of Palmer v. DownerSearch
-
imperfectly, and I may add unauthentically reported, it is most certainly overruled in the subsequent case of Martin v. WoodsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and for this doctrine the author quotes Talbot v. JansenSearch
-
s Law Journal 462, which must have been quoted to sustain the opposite doctrine. It is the case of the United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
See Kelly v. HarrisonSearch
-
Jackson v. LunnSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Shanks v. DupontSearch
-
of Inglis v. TrusteesSearch
-
of Martin v. CommonwealthSearch
-
of Sewall v. LeeSearch
-
Kelly v. HarrisonSearch
-
of Thomas v. AcklamSearch
-
of Coxe v. McIlvaineSearch
-
Thomas v. AcklamSearch
-
of Palmer v. DownerSearch
-
of Martin v. WoodsSearch
-
of the United States v. WilliamsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial