Citation network
Craig Vs. Leslie
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1818
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 563 (1818) U.S. Supreme Court Craig v. LeslieSearch
-
U.S. 3 Wheat. 563 563 (1818) Craig v. LeslieSearch
-
as it would have done if the conversion had been made and the trust executed in his lifetime. The case of Roper v. RadcliffSearch
-
money into land for the benefit of those for whose use the conversion is intended to be made. In the case of Fletcher v. AshburnerSearch
-
is well warranted by the cases to which the Master of the Rolls refers, as well as by many others. See Dougherty v. BullSearch
-
Yeates v. ComptonSearch
-
Trelawney v. BoothSearch
-
have done had the trust been executed and the conversion actually made in his lifetime. In the case of Kirkman v. MillsSearch
-
The same doctrine is laid down and maintained in the case of Edwards v. CountessSearch
-
is called upon to decide, and would render any further investigation of it useless were it not for the case of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
the devise from taking effect, results to the heir at law, as the old use not disposed of. Such was the case of Crewe v. BaileySearch
-
was not directed to be sold, but was suffered to descend. The case of Ackroyd v. SmithsonSearch
-
the time prescribed, resulted as money to the grantor, so as to pass under a residuary clause in his will. Hewitt v. WrightSearch
-
to a resulting trust is defeated, and the estate is considered to be personal. This was decided in the case of Yeates v. ComptonSearch
-
personal estate to the representatives of the annuitant and to those of the residuary legatee. In the case of Fletcher v. AshburnerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the beneficial interest in the money was bequeathed, and the Master of the Rolls observes that the cases of Emblyn v. FreemanSearch
-
and Crewe v. BaileySearch
-
of the old use as if it had not been directed to be sold. The third proposition laid down in the case of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
estate as may not be necessary for that purpose. But the Court cannot accede to the conclusion which, in Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
which Page 16 U. S. 586 sanctions the conclusion made in the unqualified terms used in the case of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
this privilege in all cases to the cestui que trust. It will be refused if he be an infant. In the case of Seely v. JagoSearch
-
and that such election, if permitted, would in case of his death be prejudicial to his heir. In the case of Foone v. BlountSearch
-
Cowp. 467, Lord Mansfield, who is compelled to acknowledge the authority of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
a court of equity would in such a case decree that he should take the property as money. The case of Walker v. DenneSearch
-
it is directed to be converted. Having made these observations upon the principles laid down in the case of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
any Page 16 U. S. 589 such interest, but the will or deed itself which attempts to pass it is void. In Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
that it would be a waste of time to notice them in detail. It may be further observed that the case of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
and is strictly confined in its application to cases precisely parallel to it. Lord Mansfield, in the case of Foone v. BlountSearch
-
the opinion he had before entertained, the judges would have been equally divided. The case of Attorney General v. LordSearch
-
Weymouth, Ambler. 20, was also pressed upon the Court as strongly supporting that of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
and encumbrances on land for the benefit of a charity. But if this case were in all respects the same as Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
Page 16 U. S. 591 the land was to be taken as personalty or land, and although he mentions the case of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Craig v. LeslieSearch
-
of Roper v. RadcliffSearch
-
of Fletcher v. AshburnerSearch
-
See Dougherty v. BullSearch
-
of Kirkman v. MillsSearch
-
of Edwards v. CountessSearch
-
of Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
of Crewe v. BaileySearch
-
of Ackroyd v. SmithsonSearch
-
Hewitt v. WrightSearch
-
of Yeates v. ComptonSearch
-
of Emblyn v. FreemanSearch
-
Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
of Seely v. JagoSearch
-
of Foone v. BlountSearch
-
of Walker v. DenneSearch
-
In Roper v. RadcliffeSearch
-
of Attorney General v. LordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial