Citation network
J.W. Benon Vs. State
Cites for this judgment
- Delhi High Court
- Nov 08, 1967
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
State of Kerala v. Aluminium IndustriesSearch
-
State of Kerala v. AluminiumSearch
-
Air 1906 Calcutta 291Search
-
of the Constitution. However, it is now settled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in S. A. L. Naravan Row etc. v. IshwarlalSearch
-
Bhagwandas etc. and in Ramesh and antoher v. JendalalSearch
-
Nadhmal v. CommissionersSearch
-
In United Mtoors (India) Limited v. StateSearch
-
State of Bombay v. UnitedSearch
-
In Inder Singh v. StateSearch
-
In Mandir Thakar Dawara v. StateSearch
-
In Manindra v. MunicipalSearch
-
In Mohd. Ibrahim v. DeputySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Shanmuga Rajeshwar Sethupathi v. StateSearch
-
In M. S. Ganabathi Nadar v. StateSearch
-
In Bankimchandra Chakravarty v. RegionalSearch
-
AIR1957Mad570 , v. RamaswamySearch
-
the joint application for quashing the several prosecutions was nto maintainable. 19. In Bishwaranjan Bose and tohers v. TheSearch
-
terminating their services, and that, thereforee, they should have made 4 separate applications for separate writs. v. RamaswamySearch
-
was held that separate writ petitions should have been filed by the 4 petitioners. (18) In Annum Adinarayana and antoher v. StateSearch
-
Collector of Monghy v. ParatapSearch
-
In Management of Rainbow Dyeing Factory v. IndustrialSearch
-
good law in view of the recent decision of the Supreme Court referred to above by me. (20) In Uma Shankar Rai and tohers v. DivisionalSearch
-
In Qurbali v. GovernmentSearch
-
gave rise to one cause of action, and the relief sought for by all the petitioners was the same (22) In Balak and tohers v. StateSearch
-
In Revenue Palwaris Union v. StateSearch
-
In Ramchand Nihalchand Advani v. AnandlalSearch
-
s. Mount Corporation and tohers v. DirectorSearch
-
In N. C. Upadhaya v. StateSearch
-
Uma Shanker Rai v. DivisionalSearch
-
In Khurjawala Buckles Manufacturing Co. v. CommissionerSearch
-
In Khemkaran v. StateSearch
-
a large number of persons. (29) Thus, in view of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in S.A.L. Naryan Row etc. v. IshwarlalSearch
-
supra) , the legal position set out in the decision of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Annum Adinarayan and antoher v. StateSearch
-
State of Madhya Pradesh v. VishnuSearch
-
Chapter IV-F(B) of the Rules and Orders of Punjab High Court. Volume v. TheSearch
-
Brahma Shah v. StateSearch
-
Nandeshwar Prashad v. U.PSearch
-
Namit Lal v. StateSearch
-
Sarjoo Parsad v. StateSearch
-
Sarjoo Prasad v. StateSearch
-
Stae of Madhya Pradesh v. VishauSearch
-
State of Madya Pradesh v. VishnuSearch
-
State of Madhya Pradesh v. BhailalSearch
-
State of Kerala v. AluminiumSearch
-
Nadhmal v. CommissionersSearch
-
In United Mtoors (India) Limited v. StateSearch
-
State of Bombay v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial