Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Smt. Dropadi Devi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Cites for this judgment

  • Delhi High Court
  • Apr 12, 1989

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 16 linked 46 unlinked
Show
  1. Ameer-un-nissa Begum and ors. Vs. Mahboob Begum and ors. Supreme Court of India · Jan 14, 1955
  2. Relied / Followed
  3. P.C. Purushothama Reddiar Vs. S. Perumal Supreme Court of India · Dec 02, 1971
  4. Madhaorao Phalke Vs. the State of Madhya Bharat Supreme Court of India · Oct 03, 1960
  5. State of Gujarat Vs. Vora Fiddali BadruddIn Mithibarwala Supreme Court of India · Jan 30, 1964
  6. State of Seraikella Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Supreme Court of India · Apr 06, 1951
    Relied / Followed
  7. Relied / Followed
  8. Virendra Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh Supreme Court of India · Apr 29, 1954
  9. State of Saurashtra Vs. Jamadar Mohamad Abdulla and ors. Supreme Court of India · Oct 03, 1961
  10. State of Gujarat Vs. Dr. R.B. Chandrachud Supreme Court of India · Nov 19, 1968
  11. B.K. Mohapatra Vs. State of Orissa and anr. Supreme Court of India · Oct 28, 1987
  12. D. K. Mohapatra v. State of Orissa.Orissa
    Search
  13. D. K. Mohapatra v. State
    Search
  14. AIR 1924 PC 216
    Search
  15. AIR 1941 PC 64
    Search
  16. AIR 1947 PC 1
    Search
  17. In Edward Mills Co. Ltd. Beawar v. State
    Search
  18. had finally decided that the property in question was State property. 53. Letter dt.5th May, 195 1, was written by v. Shankar
    Search
  19. House in Delhi as State Property.' This note is signed by M. N. Buch, who was an officer of the Government of India and v. Shankar
    Search
  20. does not comply with the provisions of Art. 77 of the Constitution and, further, it has not been shown that M. N. Buch or v. Shankar
    Search
  21. AIR1980SC383 ). The defendant, thereforee, ought to have brought evidence on record to show that v. Shankar
    Search
  22. Constitution. No such evidence has been brought on record. In the absence of such evidence, it cannot be concluded that v. Shankar
    Search
  23. of Dattatraya Krishna Rao v. Secy
    Search
  24. of Bank of Africa Ltd. v. Cohen
    Search
  25. Duke of Wellington Glentanar v. Wellington
    Search
  26. Lawrence v. Kitson
    Search
  27. Reiner v. Marquis
    Search
  28. Duncan v. Lawson
    Search
  29. Companhia De Mocambique v. British
    Search
  30. Philipson-Stow v. Inland
    Search
  31. Nelson v. Bridport
    Search
  32. PC 216,Vajesinghji v. Secy
    Search
  33. BritishGovernment.4.,Daoatraya Krishnarao v. Secy
    Search
  34. PC 64,Secy, of State v. Rustam
    Search
  35. PC 1,Asrar Ahmed v. Dargah
    Search
  36. AIR1962SC1288 ,Promod Chandra Deb v. State
    Search
  37. D. K. Mohapatra v. State
    Search
  38. of Madhaorao Phalke v. State
    Search
  39. In Edward Mills Co. Ltd. Beawar v. State
    Search
  40. of Lachhman Dass v. State
    Search
  41. State of Gujarat v. Vora
    Search
  42. the State Government. (See State of Rajasthan v. Sripal
    Search
  43. State of Seraikella v. Union
    Search
  44. of Promod Chandra Deb v. State
    Search
  45. of Dattatraya Krishna Rao v. Secy
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial