Citation network
B. Raman Vs. to Whom So Ever
Cites for this judgment
- Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Dec 13, 2007
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Arun Kumar v. Union of IndiaSearch
-
Arun Kumar v. UnionSearch
-
is being questioned. By the impugned order, the Family Court while allowing the guardianship of the person of v. RaghawanSearch
-
has declined the claim of the appellant to regulate the bank account of v. RaghawanSearch
-
The facts in nutshell are that v. RaghawanSearch
-
is the son of K.S. Venkatramani and v. RajeshwariSearch
-
Town and Country Planning Organisation, E-Block, Vilas Bhawan, New Delhi. He expired on 31-7-67, leaving behind his wife v. RajeshwariSearch
-
and son v. RaghawanSearch
-
a mentally ill person admitted in Dr. Bose Memorial Hospital Chennai. After the death of her husband v. RajeshwariSearch
-
BHEL. That v. RajeshwariSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
mother of v. RaghawanSearch
-
expired on 10-1-2001. During her lifetime v. RajeshwariSearch
-
for the treatment of her son from the pension she received in lieu of her husband's service. That after the death of v. RajeshwariSearch
-
the appellant is looking after v. RaghawanSearch
-
That v. RajeshwariSearch
-
Canara Bank for an amount of Rs. 31,192. 48. That B. Laxmi, mother of the appellant and v. RajeshwariSearch
-
also died on 28-5-2000 leaving behind v. RaghawanSearch
-
as the sole successor. It was to declare himself as guardian of the v. RaghawanSearch
-
of Guardian & Wards Act, 1890. The Family Court while entertaining the appellant's claim for the guardianship of v. RaghawanSearch
-
cs belonging to v. RaghawanSearch
-
by the reason of any mental disorder other than mental retardation'. We have seen from the facts of the present case that v. RaghawanSearch
-
Memorial Hospital & Mental Institute, Chennai for last 25 years and the expenses of the same were borne by his mother v. RajeshwariSearch
-
in exercise of its jurisdiction as vested in it vide Section 7 of the Act of 1984 has appointed the appellant guardian of v. RaghawanSearch
-
but has declined the relief to operate the bank accounts in lieu of v. RaghawanSearch
-
provisions contained in Mental Health Act, 1987 in favour of the appellant in respect of regulation of bank account of v. RaghawanSearch
-
BHEL. That v. RajeshwariSearch
-
of State of Bihar and Ors. v. BiharSearch
-
of Carona Ltd. v. ParvathySearch
-
Choube Jagdish Prasad v. GangaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial