State Vs. Satish - Cites
- Ramreddy Rajeshkhanna Reddy and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Padala Veera Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
- Sucha Singh Vs. State of Punjab
- Prithipal Singh Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
- State of Goa Vs. Sanjay Thakran and anr.
- State of U.P. Vs. Satish
- State of U.P. Vs. Moti Ram and Another Etc.
- C. Chenga Reddy and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
- AIR1971 SC1050
- (2008)13 SCC257
- (2011) 3 SCC654
- (2013) 12 SCC796
- Mr. Pradeep Chowdhary, Advocate Versus STATE
- Mr. Ajay Kumar Pipaniya and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocates Versus STATE
- In support of his submissions, reliance is placed by the counsel for the appellants in the case of Raghubir Singh Vs. State
- In an another case of Matru vs. State
- Similarly, it was held by the Apex Court in Roliman vs. State
- In Kusuma Ankama Rao vs. State
- In Sheo Shankar Singh v. State
- In the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, in the case of Rumi Bora Dutta V. State
- In a recent judgment in the case of Raj Kumar vs. State
- The Apex Court in the case of Shambu Nath Mehra vs. The
- should not be made a ground for the Court to reject the evidence in its entirety. In case of Mritunjoy Biswas Vs. Pranab
- and omissions which materially affect the case of the prosecution but not every contradiction or omission (See Leela Ram vs. State
- of Haryana and another, Rammi alias Rameshwar v. State
- of M.P. and Shyamal Ghosh v. State