Citation network
Shiv Narayan and anr. Vs. M.P. Electricity Board and ors.
Cites for this judgment
- Madhya Pradesh High Court
- May 06, 1999
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
Dr. D. M. Surti v. State of GujaratSearch
-
Dr. D. M. Surti v. StateSearch
-
Anderson v. HumbleSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. StateSearch
-
Brennan v. TitusvilleSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. FullerSearch
-
Hoke v. UnitedSearch
-
Anderson v. HumbleSearch
-
Walton v. MissourySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
C.I.T. v. ManmohanSearch
-
in profession, one works for his livelihood.6. In this connection, our attention was invited to a decision in the case of v. SasidharanSearch
-
of Narendra v. StateSearch
-
Stuchbery & Sons v. GeneralSearch
-
of Taramal v. LaxmanSearch
-
given by learned Single Bench is a judgment in per-curiam, because of the decision given by Apex Court in the case of v. SasidharanSearch
-
the expression 'business' used in the aforesaid section. However, in subsequent decision referred to above in the case of v. SasidharanSearch
-
of Currie v. InlandSearch
-
Anderson v. HumbleSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. StateSearch
-
Walton v. MissourySearch
-
C.I.T. v. ManmohanSearch
-
Sakharam Narayan Kherdekar v. CitySearch
-
N. E. Merchant v. StateSearch
-
L. M. Chitale v. CommissionerSearch
-
of Narendra v. StateSearch
-
Stuchbery & Sons v. GeneralSearch
-
of Taramal v. LaxmanSearch
-
of L. M. Chitale v. LabourSearch
-
of Currie v. InlandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial