Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Vijayanagar Syndicate Vs. B.C. Narayan

Cites for this judgment

  • Karnataka High Court
  • Jun 18, 1992

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 3 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. Purushottam Umedbhai and Co. Vs. Manilal and Sons Supreme Court of India · Oct 07, 1960
  2. Jugraj Singh and anr. Vs. Jaswant Singh and ors. Supreme Court of India · Mar 16, 1970
  3. AIR 1948 Madras 369
    Search
  4. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  5. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  6. That Sri. v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  7. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  8. Managing Partner Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  9. Sri v. Varadarajulu'
    Search
  10. S. Suryanarayana Setty 2. R. Venkateshaiah Setty 3. Smt. Adi Sanjeeva Lakshmi 4. Smt. N. Vijaya 5. Smt. L. Indira 6. v. Nagendranath
    Search
  11. Smt. M.A. Sathyavadi 8. K.M. Rangadhama Setty The above firm of partners represented by v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  12. Sri S. Suryanarayana Setty, Managing Partner. One Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  13. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  14. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  15. of the Resolution v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  16. Managing Partner Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  17. of Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  18. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  19. Obviously Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  20. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  21. Civil Revision Petitions Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  22. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  23. Sri S. Suryanarayana Setty. For purposes of considering whether the plaints signed and verified and instituted by v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  24. of Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  25. Maktambi V. Shantabai
    Search
  26. and acts in a suit by recognised agents of parties.' What has been urged is that presentation of the plaint by v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  27. as Managing Partner is not only misconceived but the same suffers from legal infirmities as v. VaradarajwIu
    Search
  28. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  29. Sri v. Varadarajuiu
    Search
  30. In Subbiah Pillai V. Sankara
    Search
  31. of Partnership Firm Sri v. Varadarajuiu
    Search
  32. Managing Partner of Firm. In GURUSHIDDAYYA v. SHAH
    Search
  33. Mandalasa Devi V. Amanarain
    Search
  34. Bharat Sarvodaya MILL V. Mohata
    Search
  35. Original plaint is no plaint in law and therefore it is a mere nullity of a process. 2. Suit as filed by v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  36. s. Vijaya Syndicate to empower v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  37. of the pleadings by duly authorised person and to sue and to be sued whether subsequent ratification of the acts of v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  38. Jugraj v. Jaswant
    Search
  39. Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  40. That Sri. v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  41. Managing Partner Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  42. Sri S. Suryanarayana Setty, Managing Partner. One Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  43. of the Resolution v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  44. of Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  45. Obviously Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  46. Civil Revision Petitions Sri v. Varadarajulu
    Search
  47. Maktambi V. Shantabai
    Search
  48. Sri v. Varadarajuiu
    Search
  49. of Partnership Firm Sri v. Varadarajuiu
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial