Citation network
Nitisha Vs. Union Of India
Cites for this judgment
- Supreme Court of India
- Mar 25, 2021
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
(2020) 7 SCC4693Search
-
(1983) 2 SCC43341Search
-
(2008) 3 SCC131Search
-
(2014) 5 SCC43848Search
-
(2016) 7 SCC76133Search
-
(2018) 10 SCC1Search
-
(2017) 10 SCC187Search
-
Petitioners v. UnionSearch
-
Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. BabitaSearch
-
Sharron A. Frontiero and Joseph Frontiero v. ElliotSearch
-
Ministry of Defence v. BabitaSearch
-
Babita Puniya v. MinistrySearch
-
Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Brig. Nalin Kumar Bhatia v. UnionSearch
-
formal v. substantiveSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
spirit of these tenets have been endorsed in a consistent line of authority by this Court. To illustrate, in Anuj Garg 30 v. HotelSearch
-
Services Authority v. UnionSearch
-
SCC43848 PART F32empowerment. In Jeeja Ghosh v. UnionSearch
-
of India and Vikash Kumar v. UnionSearch
-
Navtej Singh Johar v. UnionSearch
-
Naz Foundation v. GovernmentSearch
-
Inspector (Mahila) Ravina v. UnionSearch
-
Indian Young Lawyers Assn. v. StateSearch
-
Joseph Shine v. UnionSearch
-
Patel Suleman Gaibi v. StateSearch
-
Dr. Jacqueline Jacinta Dias & Ors. v. UnionSearch
-
Inspector (Mahila) Ravina v. UnionSearch
-
Coleman v. AttridgeSearch
-
Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Smith v. CitySearch
-
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. InclusiveSearch
-
Essop v. HomeSearch
-
of E) v. JFSSearch
-
first be found in the judgment of 56 the South African Constitutional Court in the case of City Council of Pretoria 57 v. WalkerSearch
-
Mahlangu and Another v. MinisterSearch
-
In Ontario Human Rights Commission v. Simpsons-SearsSearch
-
Fraser v. CanadaSearch
-
the fact that the former cannot be justified, while the latter can (UK). We are of the considered view that the intention v. effectsSearch
-
as well as the harm caused by such 67 Sandra Fredman, Discrimination Law (supra n.28) at p. 187 68 Orsus and others v. CroatiaSearch
-
Race Relations v. CanadaSearch
-
Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
(Lt. Col. Sonia Anand v. UnionSearch
-
Justice KS Puttaswamy v. UnionSearch
-
Lt. Col. Reena Gairola v. UnionSearch
-
Nilam Gorwade v. UnionSearch
-
Petitioners v. UnionSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial