Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Devi Lal Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Cites for this judgment

  • Supreme Court of India
  • Feb 25, 2021

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

53 entries 3 linked 50 unlinked
Show
  1. Hari Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr. Supreme Court of India · May 05, 2009
  2. Pratap Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr. Supreme Court of India · Feb 02, 2005
  3. Bijender Singh Vs. State of Haryana and anr. Supreme Court of India · Mar 28, 2005
  4. (2016) 11 SCC7864
    Search
  5. (2010) 5 SCC344
    Search
  6. (2012) 8 SCC34
    Search
  7. (2013) 11 SCC193
    Search
  8. (2020) 10 SCC555
    Search
  9. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  10. Appellants V. State
    Search
  11. Appeal No.700 of 1999. 1 High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench Indore Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  12. first blow hit me on the bone (calf) of right leg. Gokul had given second Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  13. at about 12.45 a.m. on 20.07.1998. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  14. on lower part of right hand four and half X two and a half cm. dimension. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  15. Devilal were tried in Special Offence Case No.88 of 1998 as stated above. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  16. station, myself, my Jeth, my Devrani, two Devars, mother-in-law and Devi Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  17. become unconscious at once and will not remain in the state of speaking. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  18. each, in default whereof to undergo further imprisonment for two years. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  19. and order dated 14.09.2006 which decision is presently under challenge. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  20. Hari Ram v. State
    Search
  21. has forwarded report dated 03.12.2018 to this Court. 2 (2009) 13 SCC211Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  22. force in that area, shall be continued in that court as if this Act had Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  23. Muntyaz v. State
    Search
  24. of Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  25. Pratap Singh v. State
    Search
  26. refers to cases where a person had 3 (2016) 11 SCC7864 (2005) 3 SCC551Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  27. In Bijender Singh v. State
    Search
  28. within the purview of the 2000 5 (2005) 3 SCC685Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  29. In Dharambir v. State
    Search
  30. imposed and forward the case to the Juvenile Justice 6 (2010) 5 SCC344Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  31. Kalu v. State
    Search
  32. when the Juvenile Act came into force, and the 7 (2012) 8 SCC34Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  33. Jitendra Singh v. State
    Search
  34. be released on probation of good conduct, to be placed 8 (2013) 11 SCC193Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  35. In Jitendra Singh v. State
    Search
  36. Jitendra Singh v. State
    Search
  37. Bhoorey v. State
    Search
  38. Hari Ram v. State
    Search
  39. at this stage can decide and determine the question of 9 (2020) 10 SCC555Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  40. has further submitted that, as accepted by PW1-Sajan Bai, witnesses were Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  41. of the deposition of PW9-Dr Kothari shows that if the symptoms stated Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  42. It is relevant to note that no such questions were put to PW2-Saman Bai. Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  43. Justice Board for determining appropriate quantum of fine that should Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2007 Devilal and ors. v. State
    Search
  44. Jitendra Singh v. State
    Search
  45. Hari Ram v. State
    Search
  46. Muntyaz v. State
    Search
  47. Pratap Singh v. State
    Search
  48. In Bijender Singh v. State
    Search
  49. In Dharambir v. State
    Search
  50. Kalu v. State
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales