Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hillman Vs. Maretta

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 03, 2013

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 8 linked 41 unlinked
Show
  1. Hines Vs. Davidowitz US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1941
  2. Hisquierdo Vs. Hisquierdo US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1979
  3. Ridgway Vs. Ridgway US Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1981
  4. Pliva, Inc. Vs. Mensing US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2011
  5. Egelhoff Vs. Egelhoff US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2001
  6. Rose Vs. Rose US Supreme Court · May 18, 1987
  7. Wyeth Vs. Levine US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 2009
  8. Wissner Vs. Wissner US Supreme Court · Feb 06, 1950
  9. See United States v. Detroit
    Search
  10. Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Hillman V. Maretta
    Search
  11. Crosby v. National
    Search
  12. In Wissner v. Wissner
    Search
  13. Ridgway v. Ridgway
    Search
  14. as to all but footnote 4. Thomas, J., and Alito, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Hillman v. Maretta
    Search
  15. Jacqueline Hillman, Petitioner V. Judy
    Search
  16. See Brown v. Hotel
    Search
  17. Foreign Trade Council, 530 U. S. 363, 372 (2000) (citing Hines v. Davidowitz
    Search
  18. Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
    Search
  19. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff
    Search
  20. Cf. Hardy v. Hardy
    Search
  21. In Wissner v. Wissner
    Search
  22. Andrus v. Glover
    Search
  23. FEGLIA. See TRW Inc. v. Andrews
    Search
  24. Rose v. Rose
    Search
  25. Sprietsma v. Mercury
    Search
  26. Arizona v. United
    Search
  27. Justice Scalia joins all but footnote 4 of this opinion. 2 Compare, e.g., Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Zaldivar
    Search
  28. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  29. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McMorris
    Search
  30. Neal v. Gonzalez
    Search
  31. Hardy v. Hardy
    Search
  32. McCord v. Spradling
    Search
  33. Kidd v. Pritzel
    Search
  34. beneficiary. It is not, as Hillman suggests, a general rule authorizing state law to supersede FEGLIA. Hillman v. Maretta
    Search
  35. Wyeth v. Levine
    Search
  36. s conclusion that Section D is pre-empted and, therefore, concur in the judgment. Hillman v. Maretta
    Search
  37. Wissner v. Wissner
    Search
  38. U. S. 655 (1950) , and Ridgway v. Ridgway
    Search
  39. See United States v. Detroit
    Search
  40. Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Hillman V. Maretta
    Search
  41. See Brown v. Hotel
    Search
  42. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
    Search
  43. Cf. Hardy v. Hardy
    Search
  44. FEGLIA. See TRW Inc. v. Andrews
    Search
  45. Arizona v. United
    Search
  46. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Zaldivar
    Search
  47. Hardy v. Hardy
    Search
  48. FEGLIA. Hillman v. Maretta
    Search
  49. and Ridgway v. Ridgway
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales