Citation network
Salinas Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 17, 2013
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Genovevo Salinas, Petitioner V. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. MoniaSearch
-
Quinn v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
noncustodial, and the parties litigated this case on the assumption that he was not read Miranda warnings. See Mi- randa v. ArizonaSearch
-
United States v. RiveraSearch
-
United States v. MooreSearch
-
Garner v. UnitedSearch
-
Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
-
Hoffman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 341 U. S. 479, 486 (1951) , or cure any potential self-incrimination through a grant of immunity, see Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
See Roberts v. UnitedSearch
-
Hutcheson v. UnitedSearch
-
Griffin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Turner v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. PataneSearch
-
Garrity v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 497 (1967) (public employment). See also Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSearch
-
Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
Albertson v. SubversiveSearch
-
Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In Roberts v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SullivanSearch
-
United States v. KordelSearch
-
Berghuis v. ThompkinsSearch
-
See Doyle, v. OhioSearch
-
Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
South Dakota v. NevilleSearch
-
Doyle v. OhioSearch
-
Jenkins v. AndersonSearch
-
of prosecutors, who often use immunity to compel testimony from witnesses who invoke the . Salinas v. TexasSearch
-
In Griffin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Mitchell v. UnitedSearch
-
Fifth Amendment claim fails and, therefore, concur in the judgment. Salinas v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 609 , n. 2, 613 (1965) (internal quotation marks omitted). See also United States v. PataneSearch
-
interrogation, a contrary rule would undermine the basic protection that the Fifth Amendment provides. Cf. Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
very much what the Fifth Amendment forbids. Cf. Pennsylvania v. MunizSearch
-
Hurd v. TerhuneSearch
-
United States v. MaySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial