Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Vance Vs. Ball State Univ.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 24, 2013

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

69 entries 2 linked 67 unlinked
Show
  1. Burlington Industries, Inc. Vs. Ellerth US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1998
  2. Pennsylvania State Police Vs. Suders US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2004
  3. Vance v. Ball
    Search
  4. See United States v. Detroit
    Search
  5. Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Vance V. Ball
    Search
  6. Faragher v. Boca
    Search
  7. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Vance v. Ball
    Search
  8. Maetta Vance, Petitioner V. Ball
    Search
  9. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
    Search
  10. U. S. 742 (1998) , and Far- agher v. Boca
    Search
  11. Hall v. Bodine
    Search
  12. of Rogers v. EEOC
    Search
  13. See Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
    Search
  14. Harris v. Forklift
    Search
  15. Noviello v. Boston
    Search
  16. Weyers v. Lear
    Search
  17. Mack v. Otis
    Search
  18. See Volk v. Coler
    Search
  19. Parkins v. Civil
    Search
  20. Jansen v. Packaging
    Search
  21. Cf. Rhodes v. Illinois
    Search
  22. Rhodes v. Illinois
    Search
  23. Rhodes v. Illinois
    Search
  24. Eeoc V. Crst
    Search
  25. Noviello v. Boston
    Search
  26. Parkins v. Civil
    Search
  27. the judgment of the Seventh Circuit is affirmed. It is so ordered. Notes 1 See, e.g., Williams v. Waste
    Search
  28. McGinest v. GTE
    Search
  29. Joens v. John
    Search
  30. Duch v. Jakubek
    Search
  31. Huston v. Procter
    Search
  32. See Spriggs v. Diamond
    Search
  33. Skidmore v. Swift
    Search
  34. Frenchtown Acquisition Co., Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  35. Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  36. Cf. NLRB v. Health
    Search
  37. NLRB v. Security
    Search
  38. Faragher v. Boca
    Search
  39. constitute a tangible employment action. 10 The lower court did not even address this issue. See Faragher v. Boca
    Search
  40. Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
    Search
  41. Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
    Search
  42. numberof factual variations, and marginal cases are inevitable under any standard. 13 See, e.g., Gross v. FBL
    Search
  43. Armstrong v. Burdette
    Search
  44. of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
    Search
  45. Mogull v. Commercial
    Search
  46. Whittington v. Nordam
    Search
  47. Sanders v. New
    Search
  48. Mack v. Otis
    Search
  49. LAP (SDNY, Oct. 21, 2004), Dkt. No. 63. 16 Starke herself lacked standing to pursue her claims, see EEOC v. CRST
    Search
  50. See United States v. Detroit
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial