Citation network
Minneci Vs. Pollard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 10, 2012
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
See United States v. DetroitSearch
-
Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Minneci Et Al. V. PollardSearch
-
Federal District Court dismissed the complaint, ruling that the Eighth Amendment does not imply an action under Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Wilkie v. RobbinsSearch
-
Davis v. PassmanSearch
-
U. S. 228 , for a Fifth Amendment due process claim involving gender-based employment discrimination, and in Carlson v. GreenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Bush v. LucasSearch
-
U. S. 367 , Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSearch
-
a concurring opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Minneci v. PollardSearch
-
Petitioners V. RichardSearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
See Wilkie v. RobbinsSearch
-
found that the Eighth Amendment provided Pollard with a Bivens action, and it reversed the District Court. Pollard v. TheSearch
-
Alba v. MontfordSearch
-
and Holly v. ScottSearch
-
Wilkie v. RobbinsSearch
-
Bush v. LucasSearch
-
Bell v. HoodSearch
-
U. S. 678, 684 (1946) ). See also Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSearch
-
In Davis v. PassmanSearch
-
In Carlson v. GreenSearch
-
indifference that violated the Eighth Amendment. Id., at 16, n. 1, 17 (citing Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
Chappell v. WallaceSearch
-
United States v. StanleySearch
-
of Social Security disability benefits that benefits had been denied in violation of the Fifth Amendment, Schweiker v. ChilickySearch
-
Due Process Clause, FDIC v. MeyerSearch
-
Giraldo v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Haworth v. StateSearch
-
Lawson v. SuperiorSearch
-
Thomas v. WilliamsSearch
-
Farmer v. StateSearch
-
Doe v. AlbuquerqueSearch
-
Multiple Claimants v. NorthSearch
-
Clemets v. HestonSearch
-
Williams v. SyedSearch
-
Salazar v. CollinsSearch
-
s potentially deep-pocketed employer. See Ash- croft v. IqbalSearch
-
The judgment of the Ninth Circuit is reversed. So ordered. Minneci v. PollardSearch
-
of Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSearch
-
Wilkie v. RobbinsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial