Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Maples Vs. Thomas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 18, 2012

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 4 linked 54 unlinked
Show
  1. Coleman Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1991
  2. Holland Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2010
  3. Dretke Vs. Haley US Supreme Court · May 03, 2004
  4. Murray Vs. Carrier US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1986
  5. See United States v. Detroit
    Search
  6. Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Maples V. Thomas
    Search
  7. Walker v. Martin
    Search
  8. filed a concurring opinion. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Maples v. Thomas
    Search
  9. Cory R. Maples, Petitioner V. Kim
    Search
  10. Barbour v. Allen
    Search
  11. Maples v. State
    Search
  12. Maples v. Alabama
    Search
  13. Maples v. State
    Search
  14. Thomas v. Kellett
    Search
  15. Maples v. Alabama
    Search
  16. Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  17. Maples v. Allen
    Search
  18. Marshall v. State
    Search
  19. Wainwright v. Sykes
    Search
  20. Murray v. Carrier
    Search
  21. Irwin v. Department
    Search
  22. Link v. Wabash
    Search
  23. Jamison v. Lockhart
    Search
  24. Porter v. State
    Search
  25. Holland v. Florida
    Search
  26. Lawrence v. Florida
    Search
  27. Nara v. Frank
    Search
  28. U. S. 386, 393 (2004) (quoting Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  29. s current position is in some tension with that observation. 7 Holland v. Florida
    Search
  30. Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  31. See Maples v. Allen
    Search
  32. Though Maples was not a pro se petitioner on the record, he was, in fact, without authorized counsel. Maples v. Thomas
    Search
  33. s procedural default is overcome. Maples v. Thomas
    Search
  34. Engle v. Isaac
    Search
  35. Murray v. Carrier
    Search
  36. U. S. 478, 488 (1986) ). See also Link v. Wabash
    Search
  37. Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  38. Pennsylvania v. Finley
    Search
  39. Jones v. Flowers
    Search
  40. Irwin v. Department
    Search
  41. of Veterans Affairs, 498 U. S. 89, 92 (1990) (quoting Link v. Wabash
    Search
  42. See United States v. Detroit
    Search
  43. Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Maples V. Thomas
    Search
  44. Barbour v. Allen
    Search
  45. Maples v. Alabama
    Search
  46. Thomas v. Kellett
    Search
  47. Maples v. Allen
    Search
  48. Marshall v. State
    Search
  49. Wainwright v. Sykes
    Search
  50. Link v. Wabash
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales