Citation network
Vartelas Vs. Holder
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 28, 2012
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
See United States v. DetroitSearch
-
Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Vartelas V. HolderSearch
-
See Landgraf v. USISearch
-
Propagation of Gospel v. WheelerSearch
-
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Padilla v. KentuckySearch
-
Chew Heong v. UnitedSearch
-
JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Vartelas v. HolderSearch
-
Panagis Vartelas, Petitioner V. EricSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Rosenberg v. FleutiSearch
-
Volpe v. SmithSearch
-
See Olatunji v. AshcroftSearch
-
Camins v. GonzalesSearch
-
Padilla v. KentuckySearch
-
In Chew Heong v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
and United States v. CampanaleSearch
-
United States v. PfeiferSearch
-
and United States v. HemmingsSearch
-
Witte v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 515 U. S. 389, 400 (1995) (quoting Gryger v. BurkeSearch
-
Ponnapula v. AshcroftSearch
-
s contention that Congress directed retroactive application of IIRIRA in its entirety. 6 See Kent v. DullesSearch
-
Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
See Padilla v. KentuckySearch
-
The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition 347 (1983)). Vartelas v. HolderSearch
-
Landgraf v. USISearch
-
See Martin v. HadixSearch
-
See Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSearch
-
Smith v. DoeSearch
-
U. S. 84, 92 (2003) , or one of the Due Process Clauses in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, see, e.g., Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
Optical of Okla., Inc., 348 U. S. 483, 487 (1955) , or the Takings Clause in the Fifth Amendment, see, e.g., Kelo v. NewSearch
-
United States Trust Co. of N. Y. v. NewSearch
-
the Ex Post Facto Clause. See United States v. BrownSearch
-
United States v. CampanaleSearch
-
Rosenberg v. FleutiSearch
-
See Clark v. MartinezSearch
-
See United States v. DetroitSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Syllabus Vartelas V. HolderSearch
-
See Landgraf v. USISearch
-
Propagation of Gospel v. WheelerSearch
-
Padilla v. KentuckySearch
-
Chew Heong v. UnitedSearch
-
Volpe v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial