Citation network
Walker Vs. Martin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2010 Walker V. MartinSearch
-
to judge whether a habeas petition is timely filed, Carey v. SaffoldSearch
-
see Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
requirements to ensure that they do not operate to discriminate against claims of federal rights. See, e.g., Brown v. WesternSearch
-
Fed. Appx. 793, reversed. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Walker v. MartinSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Walker V. MartinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-996 James Walker, Warden, Et Al., Petitioners V. CharlesSearch
-
see Harrington v. RichterSearch
-
and certainty necessary to constitute an adequate state bar. 357 Fed. Appx. 793, 794 (2009) (relying on Townsend v. KnowlesSearch
-
F. 3d 1200 (CA9 2009)). In a recent decision, Beard v. KindlerSearch
-
People v. RomeroSearch
-
s time bar. Martin v. HubbardSearch
-
See also Bennett v. MuellerSearch
-
s alleged violation of his constitutional rights. See Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
slip op., at 1) (quoting Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
the grounds on which he based the petition. Ibid. In Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
assessment and summarily dismiss a petition on the merits, if that is the easier path. See, e.g. , Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
cf. Ruhrgas AG v. MarathonSearch
-
applied because outcomes under the rule vary from case to case. See 357 Fed. Appx., at 794. For example, in People v. FairbanksSearch
-
and to avoid the harsh results that sometimes attend consistent application of an unyielding rule. See Prihoda v. McCaughtrySearch
-
procedural requirements to ensure that they do not operate to discriminate against claims of federal rights. See Brown v. WesternSearch
-
Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Brown v. WesternSearch
-
Court. Walker v. MartinSearch
-
Petitioners V. CharlesSearch
-
Townsend v. KnowlesSearch
-
Martin v. HubbardSearch
-
Bennett v. MuellerSearch
-
Ibid. In Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Ruhrgas AG v. MarathonSearch
-
People v. FairbanksSearch
-
See Prihoda v. McCaughtrySearch
-
See Brown v. WesternSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial