Citation network
Skinner Vs. Switzer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2010 Skinner V. SwitzerSearch
-
Third Judicial Dist. v. OsborneSearch
-
s suit. This Court has applied the doctrine only in the two cases from which it takes its name, Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Trust Co. , 263 U. S. 413 , District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
U. S. 462 . See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
s sole remedy. The pathmarking decision, Heck v. HumphreySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the invalidity of his conviction. See id. , at 487. In contrast, in Wilkinson v. DotsonSearch
-
court filings. Nor is there cause for concern that the instant ruling will spill over to claims relying on Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy and Alito, JJ., joined. Skinner v. SwitzerSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Skinner V. SwitzerSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-9000 Henry W. Skinner, Petitioner V. LynnSearch
-
The Courts of Appeals have returned diverse responses. Compare McKithen v. BrownSearch
-
Savory v. LyonsSearch
-
Bradley v. PryorSearch
-
CA11 2002) (same), with Harvey v. HoranSearch
-
and Kutzner v. MontgomerySearch
-
County , 303 F. 3d 339, 341 (CA5 2002) (per curiam) (same). In Wilkinson v. DotsonSearch
-
s conviction and sentence. Skinner v. StateSearch
-
Skinner v. StateSearch
-
decade following his conviction, Skinner unsuccessfully sought state and federal postconviction relief. See Skinner v. QuartermanSearch
-
requirement. See Skinner v. StateSearch
-
Under the governing Circuit precedent, Kutzner v. MontgomerySearch
-
on his procedural due process claim, see Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
s threshold, see Swierkiewicz v. SoremaSearch
-
s suit. As we explained in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
first, Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Trust Co. , 263 U. S. 413 (1923), then 60 years later, District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
quoting GASH Assocs. v. RosemontSearch
-
This Court has several times considered that question. Pathmarking here is Heck v. HumphreySearch
-
Ibid. We summarized the relevant case law most recently in Wilkinson v. DotsonSearch
-
see supra , at 2, results might prove inconclusive or they might further incriminate Skinner. See Nelson v. CampbellSearch
-
who has filed three or more lawsuits that fail to state a claim, or are malicious or frivolous). See also Crawford-El v. BrittonSearch
-
s ruling will spill over to claims relying on Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
see Banks v. DretkeSearch
-
Amaker v. WeinerSearch
-
sounds under Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
Beck v. MuskogeeSearch
-
Donnell, a day or two after the murders, thoroughly cleaning the carpets and inside of his pickup truck. See Skinner v. QuartermanSearch
-
But see Skinner v. StateSearch
-
s highest court. Footnote 10 The Court further observed in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
in federal court. Post , at 2, 7. Footnote 13 Unlike the parole determinations at issue in Wilkinson v. DotsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial