Citation network
Pepper Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Pepper v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 09-6822 (2011) Syllabus October Term, 2010 Pepper V. UnitedSearch
-
Pepper I, t he Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded for resentencing in light of, inter alia , United States v. BookerSearch
-
to a different district judge. After this Court vacated and remanded the Pepper II judgment in light of Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. NewSearch
-
Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
Greenlaw v. UnitedSearch
-
J., filed a dissenting opinion. Kagan, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Pepper v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States - 09-6822 (2011) Opinion of the Court Pepper V. UnitedSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-6822 Jason Pepper, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
that provision did not survive our holding in United States v. BookerSearch
-
in light of our intervening decision in Booker (and for another reason not relevant here). See United States v. PepperSearch
-
s sentence, and the Court of Appeals again reversed and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. PepperSearch
-
United States v. PepperSearch
-
judgment in Pepper II , and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 552 U. S. 38 (2007). See Pepper v. UnitedSearch
-
citing United States v. JennersSearch
-
United States v. McMannusSearch
-
Koon v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Pennsylvania ex rel. Sullivan v. AsheSearch
-
Wasman v. UnitedSearch
-
ed.). United States v. WattsSearch
-
Kimbrough v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Dillon v. UnitedSearch
-
see United States v. BrysonSearch
-
at resentencing if a district court erroneously believed the Guidelines were presumptively reasonable, see Nelson v. UnitedSearch
-
a)(6). Cf. United States v. LaBonteSearch
-
United States v. RhodesSearch
-
cf. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
it permits district courts to consider postsentencing conduct that would support a higher sentence. See United States v. StapletonSearch
-
s postsentencing rehabilitation. Cf. United States v. JonesSearch
-
Arizona v. CaliforniaSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
his motion for release pending disposition of the case here. Footnote 6 Compare, e.g. , United States v. LorenzoSearch
-
United States v. SimsSearch
-
F. 3d 911, 913 (CA8 1999) (same), with United States v. LloydSearch
-
is subject to constitutional constraints. See, e.g. , United States v. LeungSearch
-
Brief for NACDL as Amicus Curiae 11 (emphasis added). In Irizarry v. UnitedSearch
-
a). See United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
rehabilitation irrelevant in light of the narrow purposes of the remand proceeding. See, e.g. , United States v. BernardoSearch
-
States - 09-6822 (2011) Opinion of Breyer, J. Pepper V. UnitedSearch
-
of Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Pepper V. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial