Citation network
Kasten Vs. Saint-gobaIn Performance Plastics Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 07, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Kasten v. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Performance Plastics Corp. - 09-834 (2011) Syllabus October Term, 2010 Kasten V. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Dolan v. PostalSearch
-
Mitchell v. RobertSearch
-
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. StateSearch
-
written question at issue, Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSearch
-
J., joined as to all but n. 6. Kagan, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Kasten v. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Performance Plastics Corp. - 09-834 (2011) Opinion of the Court Kasten V. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-834 Kevin Kasten, Petitioner V. Saint-GobainSearch
-
violated the Act. Kasten v. Saint-GobainSearch
-
s version of these contested events as valid. See Scott v. HarrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s petition. Compare Hagan v. EchostarSearch
-
Lambert v. AckerleySearch
-
with Lambert v. GeneseeSearch
-
CA2 1993) (antiretaliation provision does not cover informal complaints to supervisors). See also Pacheco v. WhitingSearch
-
EEOC v. WhiteSearch
-
Moore v. FreemanSearch
-
considered alone, do not necessarily limit the scope of the statutory phrase to written complaints. Cf. Crawford v. MetropolitanSearch
-
And a review of contemporaneous judicial usage, cf. Utah v. EvansSearch
-
shows that oral filings were a known phenomenon when the Act was passed. See, e.g., Reed Oil Co. v. CainSearch
-
Tingler v. LahtiSearch
-
Indian Fred v. StateSearch
-
Dunn v. StateSearch
-
Morrison v. LewisSearch
-
Brock v. CullumSearch
-
Fike v. AllenSearch
-
Filings may more often be made in writing. See, e.g. , Ritter v. UnitedSearch
-
suggests a broad interpretation that would include an oral complaint. See, e.g. , Republic of Iraq v. BeatySearch
-
in the Act. See MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AmericanSearch
-
desirable informal workplace grievance procedures to secure compliance with the Act. Cf. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSearch
-
at 122 (and would do so here without pressing statutory language to its limit). See also Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. MuscodaSearch
-
Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
complaints. The Department of Labor articulated that view in an enforcement action filed many years ago, Goldberg v. ZengerSearch
-
Labor as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc in Lambert v. AckerleySearch
-
as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc in Lambert v. AckerleySearch
-
Brief for Appellee in EEOC v. WhiteSearch
-
cf. United States v. MeadSearch
-
Babbitt v. SweetSearch
-
the rule of lenity can apply when a statute with criminal sanctions is applied in a noncriminal context. See Leocal v. AshcroftSearch
-
written question that we granted certiorari to decide. See ibid. (quoting Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
It is so ordered. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Kasten v. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Performance Plastics Corp. - 09-834 (2011) Scalia, J., Dissenting Kasten V. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Kasten V. Saint-GobainSearch
-
Kevin Kasten, Petitioner V. Saint-GobainSearch
-
the Act. Kasten v. Saint-GobainSearch
-
See Scott v. HarrisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial