Citation network
Wall Vs. Kholi
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 07, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2010 Wall V. KholiSearch
-
and in which Scalia, J., joined, except as to footnote 3. Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in part. Wall v. KholiSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Wall V. KholiSearch
-
The United States No. 09-868 Ashbel T. Wall, II, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Peti- Tioner V. KhalilSearch
-
to his conviction on direct appeal, but the Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed his conviction. See State v. KholiSearch
-
see generally Jimenez v. QuartermanSearch
-
State v. KholiSearch
-
court denied this motion as well, and the State Supreme Court affirmed that decision on December 14, 2006. See Kholi v. WallSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
is not defined in AEDPA, and we have never provided a comprehensive definition of that term. See Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
See Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
see also Carey v. SaffoldSearch
-
interchangeably, see, e.g., Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
and it is well accepted that state petitions for habeas corpus toll the limitation period, e.g., Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
see, e.g., United States v. MorganSearch
-
and a prior version of Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. In United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
motions, and coram nobis . Id., at 230, n. 14. Similarly, in Bartone v. UnitedSearch
-
of the federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and the promulgation of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. See State v. ByrnesSearch
-
State v. RuffnerSearch
-
A. 3d 864, 867 (R. I. 2010) (quoting State v. MendozaSearch
-
Ruffner , supra, at 867 (quoting State v. ColemanSearch
-
See, e.g., Fernandez v. UnitedSearch
-
State v. MolliconeSearch
-
U. S. 405 , 416 (1975) (quoting United States v. BurrSearch
-
that triggers that review is captioned as a part of the criminal case or as a separate proceeding. See Walkowiak v. HainesSearch
-
see also United States v. DenedoSearch
-
see, e.g., Massaro v. UnitedSearch
-
Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
R. I. Super. Ct. Rule Crim. Proc. 35(a) (2010) (emphasis added). Footnote 2 Compare Alexander v. SecretarySearch
-
Hartmann v. CarrollSearch
-
Walkowiak v. HainesSearch
-
Robinson v. GolderSearch
-
instead, they must bring a Rule 35 motion. See, e.g., State v. DaySearch
-
State v. McManusSearch
-
see also Jimenez v. QuartermanSearch
-
and do not provide a state court with authority to order relief from a judgment. Footnote 5 E.g., State v. ColemanSearch
-
State v. FerraraSearch
-
State v. RossiSearch
-
ed. 2011). We express no opinion on this question. Wall v. KholiSearch
-
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Peti- Tioner V. KhalilSearch
-
See State v. KholiSearch
-
See Kholi v. WallSearch
-
See Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
United States v. MorganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial