Citation network
Milner Vs. Department of Navy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 07, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Milner v. DepartmentSearch
-
Of Navy - 09-1163 (2011) Syllabus October Term, 2010 Milner V. DepartmentSearch
-
Department of Air Force v. RoseSearch
-
Crooker v. BureauSearch
-
Department of Justice v. TaxSearch
-
Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Milner v. DepartmentSearch
-
Of Navy - 09-1163 (2011) Opinion of the Court Milner V. DepartmentSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-1163 Glen Scott Milner, Petitioner V. DepartmentSearch
-
We considered the extent of that reach in Department of Air Force v. RoseSearch
-
Id., at 369. In Crooker v. BureauSearch
-
Id., at 1056 (quoting Jordan v. DepartmentSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Massey v. FBISearch
-
Kaganove v. EPASearch
-
Schiller v. NLRBSearch
-
N Fly, Inc. v. DollarSearch
-
Random House 1075. FOIA itself provides an additional example in Exemption 6. See Ratzlaf v. UnitedSearch
-
see Department of Interior v. KlamathSearch
-
this word change as easily supports the inference that Congress merely swapped one synonym for another. Cf. Mead Corp. v. TilleySearch
-
until little of the actual provision remains. Elliott v. DepartmentSearch
-
of Exemption 2 renders Exemption 7(E) superfluous and so deprives that amendment of any effect. See, e.g., TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSearch
-
reading. See supra , at 3. One Circuit has reserved judgment on the High 2-Low 2 debate. See Audubon Society v. ForestSearch
-
U. S., at 361. Super 2 in fact has no basis in the text, context, or purpose of FOIA, and we accordingly reject it. v. AlthoughSearch
-
s scope, consistent with the interpretation adopted in Rose . See Cox v. DepartmentSearch
-
Stokes v. BrennanSearch
-
Hawkes v. IRSSearch
-
and did so across the length and breadth of the Federal Government. See, e.g. , John Doe Agency v. JohnSearch
-
is incorrect. Post , at 2. In Abraham & Rose, P.L.C. v. UnitedSearch
-
shielded records of federal tax lien filings. 138 F. 3d 1075, 1082 (1998). The court nowhere discussed the High 2 v. LowSearch
-
see also n. 1, supra . Subsequently, the Sixth Circuit once again held, in Rugiero v. DepartmentSearch
-
F. 3d 534, 549 (2001). In Sladek v. BensingerSearch
-
how to apply High 2. Fault lines include whether the risk of circumvention must be significant, see, e.g., Hidalgo v. FBISearch
-
on multiple occasions to withhold information about (of all things) bird nesting sites. See Audubon Society v. ForestSearch
-
Maricopa Audubon Soc. v. ForestSearch
-
s goal of broad disclosure. Milner v. DepartmentSearch
-
Of Navy - 09-1163 (2011) Alito, J., Concurring Milner V. DepartmentSearch
-
See John Doe Agency v. JohnSearch
-
sweeps in activities beyond investigation and prosecution. See Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSearch
-
this threshold requirement is satisfied, the ESQD information may fall comfortably within Exemption 7(F). Milner v. DepartmentSearch
-
Of Navy - 09-1163 (2011) Breyer, J., Dissenting Milner V. DepartmentSearch
-
American Express Inc. v. McMahonSearch
-
U. S. 220 , 268 (1987) (opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part) (emphasis added). See also Commissioner v. FinkSearch
-
I would apply that principal to this case and accept the 30-year-old decision by the D. C. Circuit in Crooker v. BureauSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Milner V. DepartmentSearch
-
Glen Scott Milner, Petitioner V. DepartmentSearch
-
In Crooker v. BureauSearch
-
Jordan v. DepartmentSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial