Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schindler Elevator Corp. Vs. United States Ex Rel. Kirk

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 26, 2011

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 2 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Asgrow Seed Co. Vs. Winterboer US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1995
  2. Tyler Vs. Cain US Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2001
  3. Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United
    Search
  4. States Ex Rel. Kirk Syllabus October Term, 2010 Schindler Elevator Corp. V. United
    Search
  5. s ordinary meaning. See, e.g., Gross v. FBL
    Search
  6. s generally broad scope, see, e.g., Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist. v. United
    Search
  7. joined. Kagan, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United
    Search
  8. States Ex Rel. Kirk - 10-188 (2011) Opinion of the Court Schindler Elevator Corp. V. United
    Search
  9. Supreme Court of the United States No. 10-188 Schindler Elevator Corporation, Peti-Tioner V. United
    Search
  10. agreeing with United States ex rel. Haight v. Catholic
    Search
  11. Healthcare West , 445 F. 3d 1147 (CA9 2006), and disagreeing with United States ex rel. Mistick PBT v. Housing
    Search
  12. s ordinary meaning. See Gross v. FBL
    Search
  13. Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist. v. United
    Search
  14. see also Tyler v. Cain
    Search
  15. a term that courts have recognized as having a broad meaning. See, e.g., Moore v. New
    Search
  16. Hamilton v. United
    Search
  17. Muscarello v. United
    Search
  18. Robinson v. Shell
    Search
  19. Oil Co. , 519 U. S. 337 , 340 (1997) (quoting United States v. Ron
    Search
  20. he had discovered the basis for his lawsuit by reading a federal criminal indictment. See United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess
    Search
  21. e)(4)(A). That question has divided the Courts of Appeals, and we do not resolve it here. See Glaser v. Wound
    Search
  22. bar. Because the amendments are not applicable to pending cases, Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist. v. United
    Search
  23. who were the cause of the public disclosure, while others have been more generous. See United States ex rel. Duxbury v. Ortho
    Search
  24. among the Courts of Appeals). That question is not before us, and we do not decide it. Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United
    Search
  25. States Ex Rel. Kirk - 10-188 (2011) Ginsburg, J., Dissenting Schindler Elevator Corp. V. United
    Search
  26. Soil and Water Conservation Dist. v. United
    Search
  27. Gross v. FBL
    Search
  28. Opinion of the Court Schindler Elevator Corp. V. United
    Search
  29. Schindler Elevator Corporation, Peti-Tioner V. United
    Search
  30. Haight v. Catholic
    Search
  31. Mistick PBT v. Housing
    Search
  32. See Gross v. FBL
    Search
  33. Moore v. New
    Search
  34. United States v. Ron
    Search
  35. Marcus v. Hess
    Search
  36. See Glaser v. Wound
    Search
  37. Duxbury v. Ortho
    Search
  38. Ginsburg, J., Dissenting Schindler Elevator Corp. V. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales