Citation network
Camreta Vs. Greene
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 16, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Alford v. GreeneSearch
-
Et Al. Syllabus October Term, 2010 Camreta V. GreeneSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in the suit. Summers v. EarthSearch
-
Lujan v. DefendersSearch
-
Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
the necessary stake not only at the outset of litigation, but throughout its course. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSearch
-
case or controversy, no matter that the appealing party was the prevailing party below. See Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. RoperSearch
-
Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSearch
-
and Bivens v. SixSearch
-
courts to determine whether a right exists before examining whether it was clearly established. See, e.g ., Pearson v. CallahanSearch
-
Bunting v. MellenSearch
-
there is no live controversy to review. United States v. ConcentratedSearch
-
practice is to vacate the judgment below, see, e.g., United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
Alford, Deputy Sheriff, Deschutes County, Oregon v. GreeneSearch
-
Personally and as Next Friend of S. G., a Minor, et al., also on certiorari to the same court. Camreta v. GreeneSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Camreta V. GreeneSearch
-
s right to appeal, see United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
s case-or-controversy requirement. See Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. RoperSearch
-
consider cases at the request of a prevailing party, even when the Constitution allowed us to do so. See, e.g., Gunn v. UniversitySearch
-
New York Telephone Co. v. MaltbieSearch
-
see also Bunting v. MellenSearch
-
s favor. See California v. RooneySearch
-
invoked in this case) and Bivens v. SixSearch
-
right, they are shielded from personal liability, Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Lyng v. NorthwestSearch
-
see also Ashwander v. TVASearch
-
situation because it threatens to leave standards of official conduct permanently in limbo. County of Sacramento v. LewisSearch
-
and the promotion of law-abiding behavior. Pearson v. CallahanSearch
-
Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
we have no live controversy to review. United States v. ConcentratedSearch
-
see, e.g., Atherton Mills v. JohnstonSearch
-
that ruling. U. S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. BonnerSearch
-
See, e.g. , Arave v. HoffmanSearch
-
Selig v. PediatricSearch
-
above. But some kinds of constitutional questions do not often come up in these alternative settings. Pearson v. CallahanSearch
-
when determining if constitutional rights are clearly established for purposes of qualified immunity. See, e.g., Kalka v. HawkSearch
-
cf. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial