Citation network
Davis Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
States Syllabus October Term, 2010 Davis V. UnitedSearch
-
acknowledged that the search of the vehicle complied with existing Eleventh Circuit precedent interpreting New York v. BeltonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Court denied the motion, and Davis was convicted. While his appeal was pending, this Court announced, in Arizona v. GantSearch
-
s sole purpose is to deter future Fourth Amendment violations, e.g. , Herring v. UnitedSearch
-
s heavy costs. Under a line of cases beginning with United States v. LeonSearch
-
retroactively in this case, and Davis may invoke its newly announced rule as a basis for seeking relief. See Griffith v. KentuckySearch
-
application of a new rule does not determine the question of what remedy the defendant should obtain. See Powell v. NevadaSearch
-
The remedy of exclusion does not automatically follow from a Fourth Amendment violation, see Arizona v. EvansSearch
-
concurring in the judgment. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 09-11328 (2011) Opinion of the Court Davis V. UnitedSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-11328 Willie Gene Davis, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
s decision in Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See New York v. BeltonSearch
-
In New York v. BeltonSearch
-
see Brief for Petitioner in New York v. BeltonSearch
-
arrestee in any particular case was within reaching distance of the vehicle at the time of the search. See Thornton v. UnitedSearch
-
Not every court, however, agreed with this reading of Belton . In State v. GantSearch
-
This Court granted certiorari in Gant , see 552 U. S. 1230 (2008), and affirmed in a 5-to-4 decision. Arizona v. GantSearch
-
authorizing substantially contemporaneous vehicle searches incident to arrests of recent occupants. See United States v. GonzalezSearch
-
Id. , at 1265 (quoting Herring v. UnitedSearch
-
doctrine, Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
see Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
occasioned by an unconstitutional search. Stone v. PowellSearch
-
see United States v. JanisSearch
-
one. Hudson v. MichiganSearch
-
at 591, suggested that the rule was a self-executing mandate implicit in the Fourth Amendment itself. See Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
As late as our 1971 decision in Whiteley v. WardenSearch
-
Arizona v. EvansSearch
-
U. S. 620 (1980). In a line of cases beginning with United States v. LeonSearch
-
See Leon , supra , at 919, 908, n. 6 (quoting United States v. PeltierSearch
-
see also Massachusetts v. SheppardSearch
-
s clerical error). Other good-faith cases have sounded a similar theme. Illinois v. KrullSearch
-
In Arizona v. EvansSearch
-
an arrest warrant in a database maintained by judicial employees. Id. , at 14. Most recently, in Herring v. UnitedSearch
-
reliance on binding judicial precedent. At the time of the search at issue here, we had not yet decided Arizona v. GantSearch
-
and the Eleventh Circuit had interpreted our decision in New York v. BeltonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial