Citation network
Wal-mart Stores, Inc. Vs. Dukes
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Et Al. Syllabus October Term, 2010 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. V. DukesSearch
-
Cooper v. FederalSearch
-
b) General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
in part and dissenting in part, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. V. DukesSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 10-277 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioner V. BettySearch
-
tried as a class action because the District Court could adopt the approach the Ninth Circuit approved in Hilao v. EstateSearch
-
East Tex. Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSearch
-
U. S. 395 , 403 (1977) (quoting Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 147 , 156 (1982) (quoting General Telephone Co. of Northwest v. EEOCSearch
-
Falcon , supra , at 160 (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
to resolve preliminary matters, e.g. , jurisdiction and venue, is a familiar feature of litigation. See Szabo v. BridgeportSearch
-
the admission of expert testimony under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 702 and our Daubert case, see Daubert v. MerrellSearch
-
Watson v. FortSearch
-
such as scores on general aptitude tests or educational achievements, see Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
accord, Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSearch
-
to raise any inference that all the individual, discretionary personnel decisions are discriminatory. In Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
of whom 571 were minorities, id. , at 337, and the class itself consisted of around 334 persons, United States v. T.ISearch
-
backpay were improperly certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2). Our opinion in Ticor Title Ins. Co. v. BrownSearch
-
that predated its codification, Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSearch
-
in determining its meaning we have previously looked to the historical models on which the Rule was based, Ortiz v. FibreboardSearch
-
e.g. , Potts v. FlaxSearch
-
Brunson v. BoardSearch
-
Frasier v. BoardSearch
-
for money damages we have held that absence of notice and opt-out violates due process. See Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSearch
-
g)(2)(A)). C In Allison v. CitgoSearch
-
adequate-representation requirements of Rule 23(a). Footnote 6 A statement in one of our prior cases, Eisen v. CarlisleSearch
-
b)(3) certification must prove that their shares were traded on an efficient market, Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. HalliburtonSearch
-
see also Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
Amchem, supra , at 614. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSearch
-
Opinion of Ginsburg, J. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. V. DukesSearch
-
s finding of commonality. See Califano v. YamasakiSearch
-
cf. Ledbetter v. GoodyearSearch
-
allegations resemble those in one of the prototypical cases in this area, Leisner v. NewSearch
-
such practices are motivated by discriminatory intent but also when they produce discriminatory results. See Watson v. FortSearch
-
See also Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSearch
-
For example, in Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
step in the usual order of proof for plaintiffs seeking individual remedies for company-wide discrimination. Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
see Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
crafted in the grammatical form of a question. Footnote 4 The majority purports to derive from Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
Id ., at 738. Footnote 7 The Court places considerable weight on General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioner V. BettySearch
-
Hilao v. EstateSearch
-
Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial