Citation network
Turner Vs. Rogers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Et Al. Syllabus October Term, 2010 Turner V. RogersSearch
-
Southern Pac. Terminal Co. v. InterstateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Bank of Boston v. BellottiSearch
-
imprisoned several times, and is, once again, the subject of civil contempt proceedings for failure to pay. DeFunis v. OdegaardSearch
-
U. S. 312 , and St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
provided. The Sixth Amendment grants an indigent criminal defendant the right to counsel, see, e.g., United States v. DixonSearch
-
and Lassiter v. DepartmentSearch
-
Court has used to decide what specific safeguards are needed to make a civil proceeding fundamentally fair. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
does not always require the provision of counsel in civil proceedings where incarceration is threatened. See Gagnon v. ScarpelliSearch
-
B and II. Turner v. RogersSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Turner V. RogersSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 10-10 Michael D. Turner, Petitioner V. RebeccaSearch
-
demonstrate that he is not in contempt, say, by showing that he is not able to make the required payments. See Moseley v. MosierSearch
-
Price v. TurnerSearch
-
in civil contempt proceedings enforcing child support orders, we granted the writ. Compare, e.g., Pasqua v. CouncilSearch
-
Black v. DivisionSearch
-
Mead v. BatchlorSearch
-
Ridgway v. BakerSearch
-
right to counsel for indigents facing imprisonment in a child support civil contempt proceeding), with Rodriguez v. EighthSearch
-
Andrews v. WaltonSearch
-
F. 2d 1368, 1369 (CA9 1972) (per curiam) (general right to counsel in civil contempt proceedings), with Duval v. DuvalSearch
-
may be required on case-by-case basis). II Respondents argue that this case is moot. See Massachusetts v. MellonSearch
-
of that particular contempt determination that might keep the dispute alive. Compare Sibron v. NewSearch
-
are presumed to continue), with Spencer v. KemnaSearch
-
See, e.g. , First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSearch
-
See, e.g. , Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSearch
-
internal quotation marks omitted). Moreover, the underlying facts make this case unlike DeFunis v. OdegaardSearch
-
U. S. 312 (1974) (per curiam) , and St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
the Sixth Amendment grants an indigent defendant the right to state-appointed counsel in a criminal case. Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
that this same rule applies to criminal contempt proceedings (other than summary proceedings). United States v. DixonSearch
-
Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
what a court had previously ordered him to do. Gompers v. BucksSearch
-
Moreover, in Vitek v. JonesSearch
-
by counsel in a proceeding to transfer a prison inmate to a state hospital for the mentally ill. Further, in Lassiter v. DepartmentSearch
-
probation and imprisonment does not ordinarily have a right to counsel at a probation revocation hearing. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSearch
-
see also Middendorf v. HenrySearch
-
both the government and custodial parents to secure the payments to which they are entitled. See generally Blessing v. FreestoneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial