Citation network
Stern Vs. Marshall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 23, 2011
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Syllabus October Term, 2010 Stern V. MarshallSearch
-
s precedent in Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. MarathonSearch
-
to interpret statutes as creating a jurisdictional bar when they are not framed as such. See generally Henderson v. ShinsekiSearch
-
Arbaugh v. Y &Search
-
Lessee v. HobokenSearch
-
rather than private is that the right is integrally related to particular Federal Government action. See United States v. JicarillaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Thomas v. UnionSearch
-
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSearch
-
U. S. 833 , 844, 856. In Granfinanciera, S. A. v. NordbergSearch
-
and Granfinanciera , must be decided by an Article III court. The cases on which Vickie relies, Katchen v. LandySearch
-
U. S. 323 , and Langenkamp v. CulpSearch
-
U. S., at 85 (plurality opinion). Whereas the adjunct agency in Crowell v. BensonSearch
-
Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Stern v. MarshallSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Stern V. MarshallSearch
-
Of the United States No. 10-179 Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, Petitioner V. ElaineSearch
-
I Because we have already recounted the facts and procedural history of this case in detail, see Marshall v. MarshallSearch
-
CD Cal. 2001) (citing Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. MarathonSearch
-
a bankruptcy judge, as a statutory matter, to enter final judgment in the proceeding. See, e.g., Granfinanciera, S. A. v. NordbergSearch
-
to interpret statutes as creating a jurisdictional bar when they are not framed as such. See generally Arbaugh v. Y &Search
-
cases, Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSearch
-
Puckett v. UnitedSearch
-
and said so promptly. See United States v. OlanoSearch
-
quoting Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Laws 181). We have recognized that the three branches are not hermetically sealed from one another, see Nixon v. AdministratorSearch
-
Bond v. UnitedSearch
-
cited cases in which land issues were conclusively resolved by Executive Branch officials. Ibid. (citing Foley v. HarrisonSearch
-
See Atlas Roofing Co. v. OccupationalSearch
-
s Lessee and Crowell ). Our decision in Thomas v. UnionSearch
-
Id., at 584. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSearch
-
is Granfinanciera, S. A. v. NordbergSearch
-
Vickie argues, the Bankruptcy Court had the authority to adjudicate her counterclaim under our decisions in Katchen v. LandySearch
-
U. S. 323 (1966), and Langenkamp v. CulpSearch
-
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. PacificSearch
-
Gas & Elec. Co. , 549 U. S. 443 , 451 (2007) (quoting Butner v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 91 (Rehnquist, J., concurring in judgment). In addition, whereas the adjunct agency in Crowell v. BensonSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
only by the District Court, whether the Bankruptcy Court might retain jurisdiction over the counterclaim, cf. Arbaugh v. Y &Search
-
see Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. MarathonSearch
-
does not apply in bankruptcy proceedings as it might in other contexts. Stern v. MarshallSearch
-
Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. MarathonSearch
-
Lessee v. HobokenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial