Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Freeman Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 23, 2011

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Freeman v. United
    Search
  2. States Syllabus October Term, 2010 Freeman V. United
    Search
  3. judge uses the Guidelines range as the starting point in the analysis and imposes a sentence within the range. Gall v. United
    Search
  4. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Freeman v. United
    Search
  5. States - 09-10245 (2011) Opinion of Kennedy, J. Freeman V. United
    Search
  6. Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-10245 William Freeman, Petitioner V. United
    Search
  7. The District Court, however, denied the motion, and the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed. United States v. Goins
    Search
  8. Fed. Appx. 1 (2009). Adhering to its decision in United States v. Peveler
    Search
  9. judge will use the Guidelines range as the starting point in the analysis and impose a sentence within the range. Gall v. United
    Search
  10. Cf. Stinson v. United
    Search
  11. c)(2). See Dillon v. United
    Search
  12. Kimbrough v. United
    Search
  13. Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings. It is so ordered. Freeman v. United
    Search
  14. States - 09-10245 (2011) Sotomayor, J., Concurring in Judgment Freeman V. United
    Search
  15. see also Gall v. United
    Search
  16. United States v. Green
    Search
  17. United States v. French
    Search
  18. cf. Dillon v. United
    Search
  19. occurs in the shadow of the sentencing scheme to which the defendant would otherwise be subject. See United States v. Booker
    Search
  20. United States v. Ray
    Search
  21. United States v. Main
    Search
  22. United States v. Scurlark
    Search
  23. It appears that only the Third Circuit has applied the absolute rule advanced by the Government. See United States v. Sanchez
    Search
  24. United States v. Peveler
    Search
  25. two Courts of Appeals have adopted a wide-ranging approach similar to the one suggested by Freeman. See United States v. Garcia
    Search
  26. United States v. Cobb
    Search
  27. c)(2). See United States v. Franklin
    Search
  28. supra , and there is no indication that they have found it unpalatable, cf. post , at 9. Freeman v. United
    Search
  29. States - 09-10245 (2011) Roberts, C. J., Dissenting Freeman V. United
    Search
  30. Dillon v. United
    Search
  31. This is no academic hypothetical. See, e.g. , United States v. Franklin
    Search
  32. Gall v. United
    Search
  33. Opinion of Kennedy, J. Freeman V. United
    Search
  34. William Freeman, Petitioner V. United
    Search
  35. United States v. Goins
    Search
  36. See Dillon v. United
    Search
  37. Sotomayor, J., Concurring in Judgment Freeman V. United
    Search
  38. See United States v. Booker
    Search
  39. the Government. See United States v. Sanchez
    Search
  40. Freeman. See United States v. Garcia
    Search
  41. See United States v. Franklin
    Search
  42. Roberts, C. J., Dissenting Freeman V. United
    Search
  43. United States v. Franklin
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial