Citation network
Wellons Vs. Hall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 19, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Per Curiam Wellons V. HallSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Marcus a. Wellons V. HiltonSearch
-
constitutional claims. We know that the Court of Appeals committed the same procedural error that we corrected in Cone v. BellSearch
-
was constrained by the nonexistent record, and the State Supreme Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. Wellons v. StateSearch
-
of the matter. Lawrence v. ChaterSearch
-
cf. Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Cone v. BellSearch
-
to habeas procedures, and there is no reason to believe that the Eleventh Circuit thought otherwise. Wellons v. HallSearch
-
Scalia, J., Dissenting Wellons V. HallSearch
-
in light of Cone v. BellSearch
-
indeed, the Eleventh Circuit has already recognized the abrogation of the opinion below on this point, see Owen v. SecretarySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
including the GVR so the government can try a less extravagant argument on remand, see Department of Interior v. SouthSearch
-
Dakota , 519 U. S. 919 , 921 (1996) (Scalia, J., dissenting), the GVR in light of nothing, see Youngblood v. WestSearch
-
same), and the newly-minted Summary Remand for More Extensive Opinion than Petitioner Requested (SRMEOPR), see Webster v. CooperSearch
-
he committed his murder in 1989). Wellons v. HallSearch
-
Alito, J., Dissenting Wellons V. HallSearch
-
merits. See 554 F. 3d 923, 936 (CA11 2009). While it is true that the first of these grounds is inconsistent with Cone v. BellSearch
-
because that discovery was unlikely to yield evidence substantiating his claim. See 554 F. 3d, at 935 (quoting Schriro v. LandriganSearch
-
Wellons v. StateSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
of Cone v. BellSearch
-
Owen v. SecretarySearch
-
Department of Interior v. SouthSearch
-
Youngblood v. WestSearch
-
Webster v. CooperSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial