Citation network
Wilkins Vs. Gaddy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Per Curiam Wilkins V. GaddySearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Jamey L. Wilkins V. OfficerSearch
-
Decided February 22, 2010 Per Curiam. In Hudson v. McMillianSearch
-
WD NC, Apr. 16, 2008), pp. 1, 2 (citing Taylor v. McDuffieSearch
-
Riley v. DortonSearch
-
in order to state an excessive force claim. Hudson v. McMillianSearch
-
see also Whitley v. AlbersSearch
-
no discernible injury almost certainly fails to state a valid excessive force claim. Ibid. (quoting Johnson v. GlickSearch
-
s earlier decision in Norman v. TaylorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s de minimis injury requirement. See, e.g. , Wright v. GoordSearch
-
Smith v. MensingerSearch
-
Oliver v. KellerSearch
-
United States v. LaValleeSearch
-
s approach. See, e.g. , Gomez v. ChandlerSearch
-
But see Brown v. LippardSearch
-
s Eighth Amendment analysis is inconsistent with Hudson v. McMillianSearch
-
U. S. 1 (1992). But I continue to believe that Hudson was wrongly decided. Erickson v. PardusSearch
-
at 38 (Thomas, J., dissenting) . The Court adhered to this understanding until 1976, when it declared in Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
see generally Wilson v. SeiterSearch
-
Per Curiam. In Hudson v. McMillianSearch
-
Taylor v. McDuffieSearch
-
Johnson v. GlickSearch
-
Norman v. TaylorSearch
-
Wright v. GoordSearch
-
Gomez v. ChandlerSearch
-
Brown v. LippardSearch
-
Wilson v. SeiterSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial