Citation network
Florida Vs. Powell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 24, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Florida V. PowellSearch
-
Decided February 23, 2010 In a pathmarking decision, Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
as well as Miranda, hence the decision rested on an adequate and independent state ground. See Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
U. S. 722 , 729. Under Michigan v. LongSearch
-
this Court has not dictated the words in which the essential information must be conveyed. See, e.g., California v. PrysockSearch
-
as to Part II. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, J., joined as to Part II. Florida v. PowellSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Florida V. PowellSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-1175 Florida, Petitioner V. KevinSearch
-
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. In a pathmarking decision, Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
See Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
Minnesota v. NationalSearch
-
Ibid. To that end, we announced, in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
of the right to the presence of counsel during custodial interrogation violates the principles espoused in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
quoting Arizona v. EvansSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 8 (1995)). See also, e.g. , Oregon v. HassSearch
-
but this Court has not dictated the words in which the essential information must be conveyed. See California v. PrysockSearch
-
Footnote 2 Dissenting in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
See also Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
App. 80. Florida v. PowellSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Florida V. PowellSearch
-
voluntariness of confessions as required by article I, section 9 of the Florida Constitution, this Court in Traylor v. StateSearch
-
incrimination need not track our construction of the parallel provision in the Federal Constitution. See Rigterink v. StateSearch
-
s decision in United States v. LamiaSearch
-
The Court relies on Duckworth v. EaganSearch
-
limit its application to cases in which the independence of the state-law ground is in serious doubt. See Pennsylvania v. LabronSearch
-
Footnote 2 See, e.g. , Illinois v. FisherSearch
-
Oliver v. UnitedSearch
-
Footnote 3 See, e.g. , Fitzgerald v. RacingSearch
-
Commonwealth v. LabronSearch
-
is clearly not dependent upon federal law. Rigterink v. StateSearch
-
Traylor v. StateSearch
-
during interrogation did not adequately inform a suspect of his Miranda rights. See, e.g. , United States v. TillmanSearch
-
Under Michigan v. LongSearch
-
Part II. Florida v. PowellSearch
-
Florida, Petitioner V. KevinSearch
-
Arizona v. EvansSearch
-
See California v. PrysockSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial