Citation network
Conkright Vs. Frommert
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 20, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Conkright V. FrommertSearch
-
Court addressed the standard for reviewing the decisions of ERISA plan administrators in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
with no suggestion that it was susceptible to ad hoc exceptions. This Court held in Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GlennSearch
-
and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Conkright v. FrommertSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Conkright V. FrommertSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-810 Sally L. Conkright, Et Al., Petitioners V. PaulSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mertens v. HewittSearch
-
and complicated. (The one at issue here runs to 81 pages, with 139 sections.) We held in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
s approach in Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GlennSearch
-
Eaton v. EatonSearch
-
State v. RubionSearch
-
they had earned, but Congress did not require employers to establish benefit plans in the first place. Lockheed Corp. v. SpinkSearch
-
U. S. 200 , 215 (2004) (quoting Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSearch
-
which would presumably include taking some cognizance of the time value of money. See Miller v. XeroxSearch
-
opinion of Breyer, J.). See, e.g., Hanford v. ClancySearch
-
Finch v. WachoviaSearch
-
the merits, not the proper standard of review, and we leave it to be decided, if necessary, on remand. Conkright v. FrommertSearch
-
Breyer, J., Dissenting Conkright V. FrommertSearch
-
by which to review the actions of an ERISA plan administrator. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
see also Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GlennSearch
-
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. CentralSearch
-
see also Firestone , supra , at 111. Judges deciding trust law cases have said the same. See, e.g., Colton v. ColtonSearch
-
exercise its discretion to craft a remedy if a trustee has previously abused its discretion. See Old Colony Trust Co. v. RoddSearch
-
Orr v. MosesSearch
-
case should seek to have the trustee removed rather than trying to administer the trust funds itself.) See Hanford v. ClancySearch
-
s Note, at 283 (citing cases such as Coker v. CokerSearch
-
citing cases such as Emmert v. OldSearch
-
of ERISA plan administrators. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. CentralSearch
-
Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. RussellSearch
-
See, e.g., Cook v. LibertySearch
-
Zervos v. VerizonSearch
-
Grosz-Salomon v. PaulSearch
-
s remedial authority, Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co. v. KnudsonSearch
-
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
Petitioners V. PaulSearch
-
See Miller v. XeroxSearch
-
Hanford v. ClancySearch
-
See Old Colony Trust Co. v. RoddSearch
-
See Hanford v. ClancySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial