Citation network
Perdue Vs. Kenny A.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 21, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Perdue v. KennySearch
-
A. - 08-970 (2010) Syllabus October Term, 2009 Perdue V. KennySearch
-
and it is readily administrable, see, e.g., Burlington v. DagueSearch
-
to induce a capable attorney to undertake the representation of a meritorious civil rights case, see Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
s novelty and complexity, see, e.g., Blum v. StensonSearch
-
concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Stevens, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Perdue v. KennySearch
-
A. - 08-970 (2010) Opinion of the Court Perdue V. KennySearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-970 Sonny Perdue, Governor of Georgia, Et Al., Petitioners V. KennySearch
-
Id ., at 1225 (quoting Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
And he reasoned that the District Court had contravened our holding in Burlington v. DagueSearch
-
s fees and expenses, see Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
alternative, the lodestar approach, was pioneered by the Third Circuit in Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Philadelphia v. AmericanSearch
-
after our decision in Hensley. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSearch
-
see also Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. WestSearch
-
of settlement will have no way to estimate the likelihood of having to pay a potentially huge enhancement. See Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
s fees is money that cannot be used for programs that provide vital public services. Cf. Horne v. FloresSearch
-
Footnote 3 Virtually identical language appears in many of the federal fee-shifting statutes. See Burlington v. DagueSearch
-
Brief for Respondents 14. But as we said in Blum v. StensonSearch
-
Footnote 6 See, e.g. , Salazar v. DistrictSearch
-
Laffey v. NorthwestSearch
-
to ensure that civil rights plaintiffs are adequately represented, not to provide such a windfall. Perdue v. KennySearch
-
only in the rarest circumstances. With these comments, I join in full the opinion of the Court. Perdue v. KennySearch
-
constitutional claims. Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
will in virtually every case already reflect all indicia of attorney performance relevant to a fee award. Perdue v. KennySearch
-
A. - 08-970 (2010) Opinion of Breyer, J. Perdue V. KennySearch
-
see also Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
see also Glover v. UnitedSearch
-
s determination for an abuse of such discretion. See Pierce v. UnderwoodSearch
-
see also General Elec. Co. v. JoinerSearch
-
Newman v. PiggieSearch
-
Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
-
ND Ga. 2003). See Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Trust Co., 263 U. S. 413 (1923), and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Perdue V. KennySearch
-
Petitioners V. KennySearch
-
Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Philadelphia v. AmericanSearch
-
Hensley. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSearch
-
Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. WestSearch
-
See Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
Cf. Horne v. FloresSearch
-
See Burlington v. DagueSearch
-
Salazar v. DistrictSearch
-
of the Court. Perdue v. KennySearch
-
Opinion of Breyer, J. Perdue V. KennySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial