Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hui Vs. Castaneda

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 28, 2010

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 4 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Bush Vs. Lucas US Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1983
  2. Davis Vs. Passman US Supreme Court · Jun 05, 1979
  3. Wilkie Vs. Robbins US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2007
  4. Osborn Vs. Haley US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2007
  5. Syllabus October Term, 2009 Hui V. Castaneda
    Search
  6. and constitutional claims against petitioners under Bivens v. Six
    Search
  7. heavy reliance on Carlson v. Green
    Search
  8. implication are not favored and will not be presumed absent a clear and manifest legislative intent to repeal. Hawaii v. Office
    Search
  9. F. 3d 682, reversed and remanded. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Hui v. Castaneda
    Search
  10. Opinion of the Court Hui V. Castaneda
    Search
  11. Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-1529 Esther Hui, Et Al., Petitioners V. Yanira
    Search
  12. a), as added, 84 Stat. 1870, precludes an action under Bivens v. Six
    Search
  13. s text and history evidence a congressional intent to preserve Bivens actions. Castaneda v. United
    Search
  14. Bivens claims. Castaneda v. United
    Search
  15. The court cited Carlson v. Green
    Search
  16. s decision in Cuoco v. Moritsugu
    Search
  17. a). See Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Salomon
    Search
  18. when it enacted the Westfall Act, see United States v. Smith
    Search
  19. remedy is available for a particular constitutional violation absent authorization by Congress. See United States v. Stanley
    Search
  20. only the existence of an implied cause of action for an alleged constitutional violation. See, e.g., Wilkie v. Robbins
    Search
  21. Hawaii v. Office
    Search
  22. factual allegations. See Fitzgerald v. Barnstable
    Search
  23. slip op., at 1). Footnote 2 In Bivens v. Six
    Search
  24. rights under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause. See Carlson v. Green
    Search
  25. See 546 F. 3d, at 687 (citing Mitchell v. Forsyth
    Search
  26. see also Osborn v. Haley
    Search
  27. f). See Brief for Respondents 32 (citing United States v. Smith
    Search
  28. Bivens v. Six
    Search
  29. Carlson v. Green
    Search
  30. Court. Hui v. Castaneda
    Search
  31. Petitioners V. Yanira
    Search
  32. Castaneda v. United
    Search
  33. Cuoco v. Moritsugu
    Search
  34. See Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Salomon
    Search
  35. United States v. Smith
    Search
  36. Congress. See United States v. Stanley
    Search
  37. See Fitzgerald v. Barnstable
    Search
  38. In Bivens v. Six
    Search
  39. the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause. See Carlson v. Green
    Search
  40. Mitchell v. Forsyth
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales