Citation network
Abbott Vs. Abbott
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Abbott V. AbbottSearch
-
s treaty interpretations. See Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSearch
-
is also substantially informed by the views of sister contracting states on the issue, see El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. TsuiSearch
-
Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Breyer, JJ., joined. Abbott v. AbbottSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Abbott V. AbbottSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-645 Timothy Mark Cameron Abbott, Petitioner V. JacquelynSearch
-
The court expressed substantial agreement with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Croll v. CrollSearch
-
Courts of Appeals for the Fourth and Ninth Circuits adopted the conclusion of the Croll majority. See Fawcett v. McRobertsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Gonzalez v. GutierrezSearch
-
CA9 2002). The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has followed the reasoning of the Croll dissent. Furnes v. ReevesSearch
-
to National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (Jan. 17, 2006), App. to Pet. for Cert. in Villegas Duran v. ArribadaSearch
-
For example, a court may force the custodial parent to pay the travel costs of visitation, see, e.g., Viragh v. FoldesSearch
-
Lombardo v. LombardoSearch
-
see Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSearch
-
El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. TsuiSearch
-
Yuan Tseng , 525 U. S. 155 , 176 (1999) (quoting Air France v. SaksSearch
-
Foxman v. FoxmanSearch
-
Sonderup v. TondelliSearch
-
to protect access rights. Thomson v. ThomsonSearch
-
See, e.g., Baran v. BeatySearch
-
Walsh v. WalshSearch
-
and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Abbott v. AbbottSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Abbott V. AbbottSearch
-
and we should not lose sight of the import of this term in construing the broad words that follow in its wake. Leocal v. AshcroftSearch
-
s international focus. See Croll v. CrollSearch
-
of different words is purposeful and evinces an intention to convey a different meaning. See, e.g. , Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
s language is plain and that language precludes the result the Court reaches. See Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSearch
-
Factor v. LaubenheimerSearch
-
Corp. v. HuddlestonSearch
-
quoting Container Corp. of America v. FranchiseSearch
-
of other signatories, to aid us in understanding the accepted meaning of potentially ambiguous terms. See Zicherman v. KoreanSearch
-
This may well be correct, but we should not substitute the judgment of other courts for our own. See Olympic Airways v. HusainSearch
-
Fawcett v. McRobertsSearch
-
in having the ne exeat clause issue resolved in the same way that it is resolved in other countries. Cf. Breard v. GreeneSearch
-
of Canada, for example, first encountered a ne exeat provision as part of an interim custody order in Thomson v. ThomsonSearch
-
s sole custodian, in Villegas Duran v. BeaumontSearch
-
to National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (Jan. 17, 2006), App. to Pet. for Cert. in Villegas Duran v. BeaumontSearch
-
Timothy Mark Cameron Abbott, Petitioner V. JacquelynSearch
-
Croll v. CrollSearch
-
See Fawcett v. McRobertsSearch
-
Furnes v. ReevesSearch
-
Villegas Duran v. ArribadaSearch
-
Viragh v. FoldesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial