Citation network
Renico Vs. Lett
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Distinguished
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Renico V. LettSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Court of Appeals reversed the conviction. The Michigan Supreme Court reversed. It concluded that, under United States v. PerezSearch
-
and that, under Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
d)(1), not whether it was an incorrect application of that law, see Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
of the trial judge, Illinois v. SomervilleSearch
-
d) The Sixth Circuit also erred in relying on its own Fulton v. MooreSearch
-
decision for the proposition that Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined, and in which Breyer, J., joined as to Parts I and II. Renico v. LettSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Renico V. LettSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-338 Paul Renico, Warden, Petitioner V. ReginaldSearch
-
shot Latona twice, once in the head and once in the chest. Latona died from his wounds shortly thereafter. See People v. LettSearch
-
Supreme Court, which reversed the Court of Appeals. The court explained that under our decision in United States v. PerezSearch
-
emphasis deleted). The court further observed that, under our decision in Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
for obtaining relief than de novo review. Schriro v. LandriganSearch
-
U. S. 458 , 462 (1973). See also Gori v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Downum v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. , at 514 (citing United States v. JornSearch
-
when trial judges decide whether jury deadlock warrants a mistrial. Wade v. HunterSearch
-
that the state court must apply. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSearch
-
see also Knowles v. MirzayanceSearch
-
precedents. The Court of Appeals also erred in a second respect. It relied upon its own decision in Fulton v. MooreSearch
-
d) on granting federal habeas relief to state prisoners. See, e.g. , Wellons v. HallSearch
-
the jury and declaring a mistrial. The Michigan Supreme Court declined to accept this confession of error, People v. LettSearch
-
whether the trial judge was right or wrong is not the pertinent question under AEDPA. Renico v. LettSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Renico V. LettSearch
-
Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
is United States v. PerezSearch
-
Downum v. UnitedSearch
-
called their deadlock into question. Logan v. UnitedSearch
-
Fulton v. MooreSearch
-
Parts I and II. Renico v. LettSearch
-
Paul Renico, Warden, Petitioner V. ReginaldSearch
-
See People v. LettSearch
-
Gori v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial