Citation network
United States Vs. Comstock
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 United States V. ComstockSearch
-
McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
between the enacted statute and the source of federal power. Sabri v. UnitedSearch
-
Burroughs v. UnitedSearch
-
s constitutionality, see, e.g., Walz v. TaxSearch
-
power to act as a responsible federal custodian. United States v. DarbySearch
-
including the powers delegated by the Necessary and Proper Clause. See, e.g., New York v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
d)(1). In Greenwood v. UnitedSearch
-
b. United States v. ComstockSearch
-
Opinion of the Court United States V. ComstockSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-1224 United States, Petitioner V. GraydonSearch
-
examined similar statutes enacted under state law to determine whether they violate the Due Process Clause. See Kansas v. HendricksSearch
-
cf. Sullivan v. FreemanSearch
-
a), and the fourth had pleaded guilty to sexual abuse of a minor, see United States v. VigilSearch
-
United States v. CatronSearch
-
s favor, thereby creating a split of authority among the Circuits. See United States v. VolungusSearch
-
United States v. TomSearch
-
those powers, United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
Jinks v. RichlandSearch
-
constitutes a means that is rationally related to the implementation of a constitutionally enumerated power. Sabri v. UnitedSearch
-
see Gonzales v. RaichSearch
-
see also United States v. LopezSearch
-
Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
to implement. Gonzales , supra, at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment) (quoting United States v. DarbySearch
-
see also United States v. FoxSearch
-
across the country as well as with the Department of Justice. Greenwood v. UnitedSearch
-
Greenwood v. UnitedSearch
-
of James v. BennettSearch
-
see also Royal v. UnitedSearch
-
to act in order to protect nearby (and other) communities from the danger federal prisoners may pose. Cf. Youngberg v. RomeoSearch
-
in an area typically left to state control. New York v. UnitedSearch
-
Thomas, J., dissenting). See also Jackson v. IndianaSearch
-
respondents here, that the statute improperly interfered with state sovereignty. See Brief for Petitioner in Greenwood v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. Similarly, in United States v. HallSearch
-
anyone who fraudulently appropriated such pensions, id., at 346. See also Stewart v. KahnSearch
-
the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. United States v. ComstockSearch
-
Kennedy, J., Concurring in Judgment United States V. ComstockSearch
-
causal chain of federal powers is merely the beginning, not the end, of the constitutional inquiry. See United States v. LopezSearch
-
see also United States v. PattonSearch
-
Sabri v. UnitedSearch
-
Walz v. TaxSearch
-
New York v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial