Citation network
Wood Vs. Allen
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Wood V. AllenSearch
-
s contrary holdings were an unreasonable application of federal law under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Rice v. CollinsSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, J., joined. Wood v. AllenSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Wood V. AllenSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-9156 Holly Wood, Petitioner V. RichardSearch
-
s conviction and sentence, Ex parte Wood , 715 So. 2d 812 (1996), as did the Alabama Supreme Court, Wood v. StateSearch
-
So. 2d 819 (1998). This Court denied certiorari. Wood v. AlabamaSearch
-
mentally retarded and not eligible for the death penalty, and that his trial counsel were ineffective under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
s claims. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals remanded for further consideration in light of Atkins v. VirginiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 304 (2002), which held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution of the mentally retarded. Wood v. StateSearch
-
Taylor v. MaddoxSearch
-
Lambert v. BlackwellSearch
-
Trussell v. BowersoxSearch
-
Ben-Yisrayl v. BussSearch
-
post , at 4. Wood v. AllenSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Wood V. AllenSearch
-
s application of Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Cf. Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
Carr v. SchofieldSearch
-
as a question of fact (citing Horton v. ZantSearch
-
Berryman v. MortonSearch
-
Tennard v. DretkeSearch
-
duty to conduct a thorough investigation of possible mitigating evidence is well established by our cases, Porter v. McCollumSearch
-
Fotopoulos v. SecretarySearch
-
Dept. of Corrections , 516 F. 3d 1229, 1233 (CA11 2008) (quoting Provenzano v. SingletarySearch
-
see also Lamarca v. SecretarySearch
-
d)(2). Footnote 3 Although Wood does not fall within the class of individuals we identified in Atkins v. VirginiaSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Holly Wood, Petitioner V. RichardSearch
-
the Alabama Supreme Court, Wood v. StateSearch
-
Wood v. AlabamaSearch
-
of Atkins v. VirginiaSearch
-
Wood v. StateSearch
-
of Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Horton v. ZantSearch
-
Provenzano v. SingletarySearch
-
Lamarca v. SecretarySearch
-
Atkins v. VirginiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial