Citation network
Jefferson Vs. Upton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 24, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Per Curiam Jefferson V. UptonSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Lawrence Joseph Jefferson V. StephenSearch
-
Jefferson v. TerrySearch
-
he was two years old). The accident left his skull swollen and misshapen and his forehead visibly scarred. Jefferson v. HallSearch
-
see also Jefferson v. ZantSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Jefferson v. ZantSearch
-
such a practice, it affirmed the judgment. Id., at 317, 320, 431 S. E. 2d, at 112, 114 (quoting Anderson v. BessemerSearch
-
s findings). Cf. Lebron v. NationalSearch
-
Death Penalty Act of 1996 and is therefore governed by federal habeas law as it existed prior to that point. Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
was an almost verbatim codification of the standards delineated in Townsend v. SainSearch
-
See 570 F. 3d, at 1300 (quoting Jackson v. HerringSearch
-
see also Demosthenes v. BaalSearch
-
apply in this case, see, e.g., Cutter v. WilkinsonSearch
-
and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Jefferson v. UptonSearch
-
Scalia, J., Dissenting Jefferson V. UptonSearch
-
our longstanding practice, that should be the end of the matter. See, e.g., Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. YeskeySearch
-
a fuller investigation into the head injury he suffered as a child was not deficient performance under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
factual findings. Jefferson v. TerrySearch
-
performance was not objectively unreasonable under Strickland . Jefferson v. HallSearch
-
Freund v. ButterworthSearch
-
Jackson v. HerringSearch
-
s precedent as announced in Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
U. S. 362 (2000), Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
U. S. 510 (2003), Rompilla v. BeardSearch
-
U. S. 374 (2005), and Porter v. McCollumSearch
-
Wood v. AllenSearch
-
Carducci v. ReganSearch
-
s factual findings. And the Circuit precedent it cited, Jackson v. HerringSearch
-
the manner which the Court suggests, that would have been no worse than what we have done. For example, in Demosthenes v. BaalSearch
-
And in Parker v. DuggerSearch
-
for certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand the case (GVR) simply to obtain a re-do. Webster v. CooperSearch
-
U. S., at 736 (quoting Order in Baal v. GodinezSearch
-
Jefferson v. HallSearch
-
Anderson v. BessemerSearch
-
Cf. Lebron v. NationalSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
and Porter v. McCollumSearch
-
Baal v. GodinezSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial